Aplicación de la teoría del dominio del hecho en el juzgamiento del caso sobornos 2012- 2016 en el Ecuador
The present investigation seeks to determine how the theory of the domain of the fact was applied to determine the authorship, co-authorship and participation of the people currently sentenced in the trial of the 2012-2016 bribery case in Ecuador, taking into account that they are committed within c...
Сохранить в:
| Главный автор: | |
|---|---|
| Формат: | article |
| Опубликовано: |
2022
|
| Предметы: | |
| Online-ссылка: | http://repositorio.iaen.edu.ec/handle/24000/6622 |
| Метки: |
Добавить метку
Нет меток, Требуется 1-ая метка записи!
|
Добавить метку | Итог: | The present investigation seeks to determine how the theory of the domain of the fact was applied to determine the authorship, co-authorship and participation of the people currently sentenced in the trial of the 2012-2016 bribery case in Ecuador, taking into account that they are committed within crimes. a power structure (Ecuadorian state). Being this the main question to which it is intended to answer, the present investigation seeks to describe, through the analysis of the sentence issued in the aforementioned judicial process, how the precepts of the theory of mastery of the fact were applied, what elements arose from the Attorney General of the Ecuadorian State to present a theory of the case based on the application of the aforementioned theory, defective were the arguments of the defense of those sentenced today and finally defective were the components of the ratio decidendi that determined the decision of the jurisdictional authorities that they knew the referential case. |
|---|