Inscripción del nacimiento de hijos de adolescentes migrantes en Ecuador: Análisis de la sentencia de la Corte Constitucional N° 2185-19-jp - 1 de diciembre de 2021
The focus of the study revolves around the registration of the births of children born to adolescent migrants in Ecuador, to be analyzed in light of Constitutional Court Judgment No. 2185-19-JP. The objective is to determine its impact by identifying the infringed rightsin the denial of birth regist...
محفوظ في:
| المؤلف الرئيسي: | |
|---|---|
| التنسيق: | bachelorThesis |
| منشور في: |
2024
|
| الموضوعات: | |
| الوصول للمادة أونلاين: | https://repositorio.puce.edu.ec/handle/123456789/42941 |
| الوسوم: |
إضافة وسم
لا توجد وسوم, كن أول من يضع وسما على هذه التسجيلة!
|
إضافة وسم | الملخص: | The focus of the study revolves around the registration of the births of children born to adolescent migrants in Ecuador, to be analyzed in light of Constitutional Court Judgment No. 2185-19-JP. The objective is to determine its impact by identifying the infringed rightsin the denial of birth registration for daughters and sons of adolescent migrants. This aims to inform about the comprehensive reparative measures applicable to the case through socio- legal, inductive, and synthetic analytical methods. Three outcomes have been developed based on the three specified objectives. Firstly, regarding the identification of norms, doctrines, and jurisprudence, it was evident that Ecuadorian legislation aligns with international instruments in terms of rights protection. Nevertheless, there are legal frameworks that have not been updated, leading to conflicts with the Constitution itself. Secondly, from the analysis of birth registration figures for children of adolescent parents, itwas observed that the variation in registration numbers for children of migrant adolescent parents during the period 2019-2022 has not been significant, indicating the low frequency. Lastly, the third outcome suggests that the comprehensive reparative measures issued by theConstitutional Court are effective. However, bureaucratic procedures within institutions hinder their complete fulfilment within the established timelines. In this process, insights from experts in family law, constitutional law, human mobility, and gender were obtained through interviews. Additionally, contributions from members of the General Directorate ofCivil Registry, Identification, and Citizenship facilitated a multifaceted approach to the subject. |
|---|