La insconstitucionalidad de la fijación del pago de la caución al artículo 27 del código orgánico general de procesos al momento de recusar, vulnerando el acceso gratuito a la justicia
This study aims to demonstrate that with the new code organic General process, which came into force on 23 May of the year 2016, would have reformed the rule about the bond to challenge a judge, the same as in the code repealed Civil procedure, had certain established parameters, which were changing...
Saved in:
| 主要作者: | |
|---|---|
| 格式: | bachelorThesis |
| 語言: | spa |
| 出版: |
2018
|
| 主題: | |
| 在線閱讀: | http://repositorio.ulvr.edu.ec/handle/44000/2206 |
| 標簽: |
添加標簽
沒有標簽, 成為第一個標記此記錄!
|
添加標簽 | 總結: | This study aims to demonstrate that with the new code organic General process, which came into force on 23 May of the year 2016, would have reformed the rule about the bond to challenge a judge, the same as in the code repealed Civil procedure, had certain established parameters, which were changing, with the reform of the procedural rule that I pitting rivalries of standards, what there should be since it establishes the Supreme law is above any organic standards, or any designated hierarchy. With this provision, article 27 General processes of organic code, was affected directly the rights of citizens, because there is an exorbitant amount that ensures a demand based upon the challenge to a judge, clearly is It obstructs the way to justice free, as the Constitution proclaims it in its article 75, which mentions the rights of protection, including free access to justice as a key element of our judicial system………. |
|---|