The Principles of Compulsory Legislative Regulation (Reserva de Ley) and Legal Certainty as Mechanisms to Defend Rights of Nature in the Ecuadorian Constitution: A Study of the Constitutional Court Rulings No. 32-17-IN/21 and No. 22-18-IN/21
The recognition of rights of nature is one of the most innovative aspects of the current Constitution of Ecuador and has attracted the attention of lawyers all over the world. This especially since 2019, when the Constitutional Court of Ecuador began to systematicallyconcretize the abstract constitu...
Saved in:
主要作者: | |
---|---|
格式: | article |
语言: | spa |
出版: |
2023
|
主题: | |
在线阅读: | https://revistas.uasb.edu.ec/index.php/andares/article/view/4035 |
标签: |
添加标签
没有标签, 成为第一个标记此记录!
|
_version_ | 1814283124725514240 |
---|---|
author | Koehn, Lena |
author_facet | Koehn, Lena |
author_role | author |
collection | Andares: Revista de derechos humanos y de la Naturaleza |
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv | Koehn, Lena |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv | 2023-04-06 |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv | text/html application/pdf |
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv | https://revistas.uasb.edu.ec/index.php/andares/article/view/4035 10.32719.29536782.2022.2.1 |
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv | spa |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv | Universidad Andina Simón Bolívar, Sede Ecuador |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv | https://revistas.uasb.edu.ec/index.php/andares/article/view/4035/4615 https://revistas.uasb.edu.ec/index.php/andares/article/view/4035/3890 |
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv | Andares: Revista de Derechos Humanos y de la Naturaleza; No. 2 (2022): Rights of nature and indigenous people; 4-14 Andares: Revista de Derechos Humanos y de la Naturaleza; Núm. 2 (2022): Derechos de la naturaleza y pueblos indígenas; 4-14 2953-6782 reponame:Andares: Revista de derechos humanos y de la Naturaleza instname:Universidad Andina Simón Bolivar instacron:UASB |
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv | Ecuador derechos de la naturaleza seguridad jurídica reserva de ley certeza democracia participativa Ecuador rights of nature legal certainty responsibilities of legislator participative democracy |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv | The Principles of Compulsory Legislative Regulation (Reserva de Ley) and Legal Certainty as Mechanisms to Defend Rights of Nature in the Ecuadorian Constitution: A Study of the Constitutional Court Rulings No. 32-17-IN/21 and No. 22-18-IN/21 La reserva de ley y la seguridad jurídica como mecanismos para tutelar los derechos de la naturaleza: Un estudio de las sentencias n.° 32-17-IN/21 y n.° 22-18-IN/21 de la Corte Constitucional del Ecuador 4-14 |
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv | info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
description | The recognition of rights of nature is one of the most innovative aspects of the current Constitution of Ecuador and has attracted the attention of lawyers all over the world. This especially since 2019, when the Constitutional Court of Ecuador began to systematicallyconcretize the abstract constitutional terms and examine the relation between rights of nature and other constitutional rights and guarantees. This paper aims to contribute to the latter by analyzing the constitutional guarantee of compulsory legislative (instead of e.g. administrative) regulation (reserva de ley) and the right to legal certainty and its role in defending rights of nature. After having introduced both constitutional concepts, the article proceeds to examine the Constitutional Court judgements n.° 32-17-IN/21 y n.° 22-18-IN/21 (Mangrove Case) focusing on the guarantee of compulsory legislative regulation (reserva de ley) and legal certainty as means to protect rights of nature. It is shown, that through the discussed constitutional concepts the Constitutional Court of Ecuador has limited the administrative regulation of rights of nature appealing to the responsibility of the legislator in matters of fundamental constitutional relevance, among them, rights of nature. The paper concludes that Constitutional Court of Ecuador thereby not only defends rights of nature but also strengthens participative democracy. |
eu_rights_str_mv | openAccess |
format | article |
id | REVANDARES_d7101d39ea3fbff99ee1e9e5f9d1cad7 |
identifier_str_mv | 10.32719.29536782.2022.2.1 |
instacron_str | UASB |
institution | UASB |
instname_str | Universidad Andina Simón Bolivar |
language | spa |
network_acronym_str | REVANDARES |
network_name_str | Andares: Revista de derechos humanos y de la Naturaleza |
oai_identifier_str | oai:revistas.uasb.edu.ec:article/4035 |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv | Universidad Andina Simón Bolívar, Sede Ecuador |
reponame_str | Andares: Revista de derechos humanos y de la Naturaleza |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv | |
repository.name.fl_str_mv | Andares: Revista de derechos humanos y de la Naturaleza - Universidad Andina Simón Bolivar |
repository_id_str | |
spelling | The Principles of Compulsory Legislative Regulation (Reserva de Ley) and Legal Certainty as Mechanisms to Defend Rights of Nature in the Ecuadorian Constitution: A Study of the Constitutional Court Rulings No. 32-17-IN/21 and No. 22-18-IN/21La reserva de ley y la seguridad jurídica como mecanismos para tutelar los derechos de la naturaleza: Un estudio de las sentencias n.° 32-17-IN/21 y n.° 22-18-IN/21 de la Corte Constitucional del Ecuador 4-14Koehn, LenaEcuadorderechos de la naturalezaseguridad jurídicareserva de leycertezademocracia participativaEcuadorrights of naturelegal certaintyresponsibilities of legislatorparticipative democracyThe recognition of rights of nature is one of the most innovative aspects of the current Constitution of Ecuador and has attracted the attention of lawyers all over the world. This especially since 2019, when the Constitutional Court of Ecuador began to systematicallyconcretize the abstract constitutional terms and examine the relation between rights of nature and other constitutional rights and guarantees. This paper aims to contribute to the latter by analyzing the constitutional guarantee of compulsory legislative (instead of e.g. administrative) regulation (reserva de ley) and the right to legal certainty and its role in defending rights of nature. After having introduced both constitutional concepts, the article proceeds to examine the Constitutional Court judgements n.° 32-17-IN/21 y n.° 22-18-IN/21 (Mangrove Case) focusing on the guarantee of compulsory legislative regulation (reserva de ley) and legal certainty as means to protect rights of nature. It is shown, that through the discussed constitutional concepts the Constitutional Court of Ecuador has limited the administrative regulation of rights of nature appealing to the responsibility of the legislator in matters of fundamental constitutional relevance, among them, rights of nature. The paper concludes that Constitutional Court of Ecuador thereby not only defends rights of nature but also strengthens participative democracy.Los derechos de la naturaleza son uno de los aspectos más innovadores de la Constitución de Ecuador, y han atraído la atención de juristas tanto ecuatorianos como internacionales. Con el desarrollo de los derechos de la naturaleza por parte —sobre todo— de la Corte Constitucional a partir de 2019, se ha empezado a concretar el contenido de dichos derechos abstractos y a discutir la relación entre los derechos de la naturaleza y otros derechos y garantías. Este trabajo tiene como objetivo hacer un aporte a este último punto, desarrollando los límites que imponen la garantía de la reserva de ley y el derecho a la seguridad jurídica en actos privados y estatales, en el contexto de los derechos de la naturaleza. Para ello, primero se analizarán la reserva de ley y el derecho a la seguridad jurídica en el contexto jurídico ecuatoriano. Luego, se examinarán dichos conceptos en relación con los derechos de la naturaleza a través de un análisis de las sentencias constitucionales n.° 32-17-IN/21 y n.° 22-18-IN/21 (caso Manglares). Como se podrá evidenciar, la Corte Constitucional ha fortalecido sustancialmente el papel del legislador en proyectos con incidencia en los derechos de la naturaleza: un aporte esencial para tutelar tales derechos y al mismo tiempo reforzar la democracia participativa.Universidad Andina Simón Bolívar, Sede Ecuador2023-04-06info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.uasb.edu.ec/index.php/andares/article/view/403510.32719.29536782.2022.2.1Andares: Revista de Derechos Humanos y de la Naturaleza; No. 2 (2022): Rights of nature and indigenous people; 4-14Andares: Revista de Derechos Humanos y de la Naturaleza; Núm. 2 (2022): Derechos de la naturaleza y pueblos indígenas; 4-142953-6782reponame:Andares: Revista de derechos humanos y de la Naturalezainstname:Universidad Andina Simón Bolivarinstacron:UASBspahttps://revistas.uasb.edu.ec/index.php/andares/article/view/4035/4615https://revistas.uasb.edu.ec/index.php/andares/article/view/4035/3890info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-08-28T21:12:43Zoai:revistas.uasb.edu.ec:article/4035Portal de revistashttps://revistas.uasb.edu.ec/index.php/andaresInstitución privadahttp://www.uasb.edu.ec/https://revistas.uasb.edu.ec/index.php/andares/oai2631-2514opendoar:2024-08-28T21:12:43falsePortal de revistashttps://revistas.uasb.edu.ec/index.php/andaresInstitución privadahttp://www.uasb.edu.ec/https://revistas.uasb.edu.ec/index.php/andares/oai2631-2514opendoar:2024-08-28T21:12:43Andares: Revista de derechos humanos y de la Naturaleza - Universidad Andina Simón Bolivarfalse |
spellingShingle | The Principles of Compulsory Legislative Regulation (Reserva de Ley) and Legal Certainty as Mechanisms to Defend Rights of Nature in the Ecuadorian Constitution: A Study of the Constitutional Court Rulings No. 32-17-IN/21 and No. 22-18-IN/21 Koehn, Lena Ecuador derechos de la naturaleza seguridad jurídica reserva de ley certeza democracia participativa Ecuador rights of nature legal certainty responsibilities of legislator participative democracy |
status_str | publishedVersion |
title | The Principles of Compulsory Legislative Regulation (Reserva de Ley) and Legal Certainty as Mechanisms to Defend Rights of Nature in the Ecuadorian Constitution: A Study of the Constitutional Court Rulings No. 32-17-IN/21 and No. 22-18-IN/21 |
title_full | The Principles of Compulsory Legislative Regulation (Reserva de Ley) and Legal Certainty as Mechanisms to Defend Rights of Nature in the Ecuadorian Constitution: A Study of the Constitutional Court Rulings No. 32-17-IN/21 and No. 22-18-IN/21 |
title_fullStr | The Principles of Compulsory Legislative Regulation (Reserva de Ley) and Legal Certainty as Mechanisms to Defend Rights of Nature in the Ecuadorian Constitution: A Study of the Constitutional Court Rulings No. 32-17-IN/21 and No. 22-18-IN/21 |
title_full_unstemmed | The Principles of Compulsory Legislative Regulation (Reserva de Ley) and Legal Certainty as Mechanisms to Defend Rights of Nature in the Ecuadorian Constitution: A Study of the Constitutional Court Rulings No. 32-17-IN/21 and No. 22-18-IN/21 |
title_short | The Principles of Compulsory Legislative Regulation (Reserva de Ley) and Legal Certainty as Mechanisms to Defend Rights of Nature in the Ecuadorian Constitution: A Study of the Constitutional Court Rulings No. 32-17-IN/21 and No. 22-18-IN/21 |
title_sort | The Principles of Compulsory Legislative Regulation (Reserva de Ley) and Legal Certainty as Mechanisms to Defend Rights of Nature in the Ecuadorian Constitution: A Study of the Constitutional Court Rulings No. 32-17-IN/21 and No. 22-18-IN/21 |
topic | Ecuador derechos de la naturaleza seguridad jurídica reserva de ley certeza democracia participativa Ecuador rights of nature legal certainty responsibilities of legislator participative democracy |
url | https://revistas.uasb.edu.ec/index.php/andares/article/view/4035 |