Los principios del Derecho de la inteligencia artificial.: Una propuesta de hard law
The use and application of artificial intelligence (AI) produces negative impacts on individuals, such as the violation of human and fundamental rights. In this paper, the principles of AI Law are proposed as an alternative for binding and obligatory regulation. In this sense, a theoretical-doctrina...
Spremljeno u:
| Glavni autor: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | article |
| Jezik: | spa |
| Izdano: |
2025
|
| Teme: | |
| Online pristup: | https://revistadigital.uce.edu.ec/index.php/CAP/article/view/8497 |
| Oznake: |
Dodaj oznaku
Bez oznaka, Budi prvi tko označuje ovaj zapis!
|
| _version_ | 1859113284150493184 |
|---|---|
| author | Jaramillo Romero, Saulo |
| author_facet | Jaramillo Romero, Saulo |
| author_role | author |
| collection | Revista CAP Jurídica central |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv | Jaramillo Romero, Saulo |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv | 2025-06-01 |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv | application/pdf application/epub+zip application/zip |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv | https://revistadigital.uce.edu.ec/index.php/CAP/article/view/8497 10.29166/cap.v9i16.8497 |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv | spa |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv | Editorial |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv | https://revistadigital.uce.edu.ec/index.php/CAP/article/view/8497/10737 https://revistadigital.uce.edu.ec/index.php/CAP/article/view/8497/10738 https://revistadigital.uce.edu.ec/index.php/CAP/article/view/8497/10739 |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv | Derechos de autor 2025 REVISTA CAP JURÍDICA CENTRAL info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv | REVISTA CAP JURÍDICA CENTRAL; Vol. 9 Núm. 16 (2025): CAP JURÍDICA CENTRAL; 6 - 20 2550-6595 reponame:Revista CAP Jurídica central instname:Universidad Central del Ecuador instacron:UCE |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv | Principios Inteligencia artificial Propersona Transparencia Beneficencia Principles Artificial intelligence Properson Transparency Beneficence |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv | Los principios del Derecho de la inteligencia artificial.: Una propuesta de hard law |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv | info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artículo revisado por pares |
| description | The use and application of artificial intelligence (AI) produces negative impacts on individuals, such as the violation of human and fundamental rights. In this paper, the principles of AI Law are proposed as an alternative for binding and obligatory regulation. In this sense, a theoretical-doctrinal study is carried out, from its origin, its passage through ethics, soft law documents, and the need for its positivization. To this end, using the qualitative method and the document analysis technique, doctrinal and institutional studies were analyzed, through which they have been developed and consolidated. The state of the art verifies that there is a doctrinal and legal agreement on six principles of AI Law: pro-person, transparency, beneficence, non-maleficence, equity, and responsibility. However, because they are ethical and indicative guidelines, they are insufficient for the development and use of human-centered AI and algorithmic transparency. As a hard law proposal, observing the reconfiguration of the social pact and the recognition of new rights such as the human right to the internet, neuro-rights (privacy and mental intimacy), and the right to human control, the need for its positivization is substantiated. |
| eu_rights_str_mv | openAccess |
| format | article |
| id | REVCAP_2457d6059702744981d8a60b59f3ed3d |
| identifier_str_mv | 10.29166/cap.v9i16.8497 |
| instacron_str | UCE |
| institution | UCE |
| instname_str | Universidad Central del Ecuador |
| language | spa |
| network_acronym_str | REVCAP |
| network_name_str | Revista CAP Jurídica central |
| oai_identifier_str | oai:revistadigital.uce.edu.ec:article/8497 |
| publishDate | 2025 |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv | Editorial |
| reponame_str | Revista CAP Jurídica central |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv | * |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv | Revista CAP Jurídica central - Universidad Central del Ecuador |
| repository_id_str | 0 |
| rights_invalid_str_mv | Derechos de autor 2025 REVISTA CAP JURÍDICA CENTRAL |
| spelling | Los principios del Derecho de la inteligencia artificial.: Una propuesta de hard lawJaramillo Romero, SauloPrincipiosInteligencia artificialPropersonaTransparenciaBeneficenciaPrinciplesArtificial intelligencePropersonTransparencyBeneficenceThe use and application of artificial intelligence (AI) produces negative impacts on individuals, such as the violation of human and fundamental rights. In this paper, the principles of AI Law are proposed as an alternative for binding and obligatory regulation. In this sense, a theoretical-doctrinal study is carried out, from its origin, its passage through ethics, soft law documents, and the need for its positivization. To this end, using the qualitative method and the document analysis technique, doctrinal and institutional studies were analyzed, through which they have been developed and consolidated. The state of the art verifies that there is a doctrinal and legal agreement on six principles of AI Law: pro-person, transparency, beneficence, non-maleficence, equity, and responsibility. However, because they are ethical and indicative guidelines, they are insufficient for the development and use of human-centered AI and algorithmic transparency. As a hard law proposal, observing the reconfiguration of the social pact and the recognition of new rights such as the human right to the internet, neuro-rights (privacy and mental intimacy), and the right to human control, the need for its positivization is substantiated.Mediante el uso y aplicación de inteligencia artificial (IA) se producen impactos negativos en las personas como vulneración de derechos humanos y fundamentales. En este trabajo, se proponen los principios del Derecho de la IA, como una alternativa de regulación, vinculante y obligatoria. En este sentido, se realiza un estudio teórico-doctrinario, desde su origen, su paso por la ética, los documentos de soft law y la necesidad de su positivización. Para ello, mediante el método cualitativo y la técnica de análisis documental, se pudo analizar los estudios doctrinarios e institucionales, mediante los cuales, se han venido elaborando y consolidando. El estado del arte permite verificar que existe un acuerdo doctrinal y legal en seis principios del Derecho de la IA: propersona, transparencia, beneficencia, no maleficencia, equidad y responsabilidad. No obstante, por encontrarse como lineamientos éticos e indicativos, son insuficientes para el desarrollo y uso de una IA centrada en la humanidad y la transparencia algorítmica. Como una propuesta de hard law, observando la reconfiguración del pacto social y el reconocimiento de nuevos derechos como el derecho humano a internet, los neuroderechos (privacidad e intimidad mental) y el derecho al control humano, se fundamenta la necesidad de su positivización.Editorial2025-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtículo revisado por paresapplication/pdfapplication/epub+zipapplication/ziphttps://revistadigital.uce.edu.ec/index.php/CAP/article/view/849710.29166/cap.v9i16.8497REVISTA CAP JURÍDICA CENTRAL; Vol. 9 Núm. 16 (2025): CAP JURÍDICA CENTRAL; 6 - 202550-6595reponame:Revista CAP Jurídica centralinstname:Universidad Central del Ecuadorinstacron:UCEspahttps://revistadigital.uce.edu.ec/index.php/CAP/article/view/8497/10737https://revistadigital.uce.edu.ec/index.php/CAP/article/view/8497/10738https://revistadigital.uce.edu.ec/index.php/CAP/article/view/8497/10739Derechos de autor 2025 REVISTA CAP JURÍDICA CENTRALinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2025-09-02T14:45:30Zoai:revistadigital.uce.edu.ec:article/8497Portal de revistashttps://revistadigital.uce.edu.ec/Universidad públicahttps://uce.edu.ec/**Ecuador*2600-60142600-6014opendoar:02025-09-02T14:45:30Revista CAP Jurídica central - Universidad Central del Ecuadorfalse |
| spellingShingle | Los principios del Derecho de la inteligencia artificial.: Una propuesta de hard law Jaramillo Romero, Saulo Principios Inteligencia artificial Propersona Transparencia Beneficencia Principles Artificial intelligence Properson Transparency Beneficence |
| status_str | publishedVersion |
| title | Los principios del Derecho de la inteligencia artificial.: Una propuesta de hard law |
| title_full | Los principios del Derecho de la inteligencia artificial.: Una propuesta de hard law |
| title_fullStr | Los principios del Derecho de la inteligencia artificial.: Una propuesta de hard law |
| title_full_unstemmed | Los principios del Derecho de la inteligencia artificial.: Una propuesta de hard law |
| title_short | Los principios del Derecho de la inteligencia artificial.: Una propuesta de hard law |
| title_sort | Los principios del Derecho de la inteligencia artificial.: Una propuesta de hard law |
| topic | Principios Inteligencia artificial Propersona Transparencia Beneficencia Principles Artificial intelligence Properson Transparency Beneficence |
| url | https://revistadigital.uce.edu.ec/index.php/CAP/article/view/8497 |