Leyendo a Ferrajoli: Consideraciones sobre la jurisdicción

The proceduralist’s attention is attracted mainly by the aspects of ferrajoli’s work dealing with the administration of justice and the characters of jurisdiction. The basic starting point is when ferrajoli stresses that jurisdiction is a secundary guarantee ensuring the judicial protection of right...

ver descrição completa

Na minha lista:
Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor principal: Taruffo, Michele (author)
Formato: article
Idioma:spa
Publicado em: 2019
Assuntos:
Acesso em linha:https://revistadigital.uce.edu.ec/index.php/CAP/article/view/1957
Tags: Adicionar Tag
Sem tags, seja o primeiro a adicionar uma tag!
_version_ 1858479062038609920
author Taruffo, Michele
author_facet Taruffo, Michele
author_role author
collection Revista CAP Jurídica central
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Taruffo, Michele
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-08-01
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://revistadigital.uce.edu.ec/index.php/CAP/article/view/1957
10.29166/cap.v3i4.1957
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editorial
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistadigital.uce.edu.ec/index.php/CAP/article/view/1957/1832
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv Derechos de autor 2019 REVISTA CAP JURÍDICA CENTRAL
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv REVISTA CAP JURÍDICA CENTRAL; Vol. 3 Núm. 4 (2019): CAP Jurídica; 275-296
2550-6595
reponame:Revista CAP Jurídica central
instname:Universidad Central del Ecuador
instacron:UCE
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Ferrajoli
jurisdicción
poderes discrecionales
Ferrajoli
jurisdiction
Discretionary powers
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Leyendo a Ferrajoli: Consideraciones sobre la jurisdicción
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artículo revisado por pares
description The proceduralist’s attention is attracted mainly by the aspects of ferrajoli’s work dealing with the administration of justice and the characters of jurisdiction. The basic starting point is when ferrajoli stresses that jurisdiction is a secundary guarantee ensuring the judicial protection of rights. Such a guarantee has to be general, since no right actually exists without an effective protection offered by courts. In judicial contexts, justice is properly administered when legal rules are correctly applied, and the truth of the facts in issue is established, according to evidence and proof, as the classical theory of judicial decision-making claims. Some problems may arise, however, but may be easily solved when one takes into account the discretionary powers -belonging to many judges- to interpret the rules creating new rights, and the cases in which remedies precede rights. At any rate, ferrajoli rejects the so-called counter majoritarian objection outlining that the basic foundation of the judge’s role is not a popular election, but relies upon the judge’s compliance with the law
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
format article
id REVCAP_d8579ca963ed7eb2bf528b3e447c9d22
identifier_str_mv 10.29166/cap.v3i4.1957
instacron_str UCE
institution UCE
instname_str Universidad Central del Ecuador
language spa
network_acronym_str REVCAP
network_name_str Revista CAP Jurídica central
oai_identifier_str oai:revistadigital.uce.edu.ec:article/1957
publishDate 2019
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editorial
reponame_str Revista CAP Jurídica central
repository.mail.fl_str_mv *
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista CAP Jurídica central - Universidad Central del Ecuador
repository_id_str 0
rights_invalid_str_mv Derechos de autor 2019 REVISTA CAP JURÍDICA CENTRAL
spelling Leyendo a Ferrajoli: Consideraciones sobre la jurisdicciónTaruffo, Michele Ferrajolijurisdicciónpoderes discrecionalesFerrajolijurisdictionDiscretionary powersThe proceduralist’s attention is attracted mainly by the aspects of ferrajoli’s work dealing with the administration of justice and the characters of jurisdiction. The basic starting point is when ferrajoli stresses that jurisdiction is a secundary guarantee ensuring the judicial protection of rights. Such a guarantee has to be general, since no right actually exists without an effective protection offered by courts. In judicial contexts, justice is properly administered when legal rules are correctly applied, and the truth of the facts in issue is established, according to evidence and proof, as the classical theory of judicial decision-making claims. Some problems may arise, however, but may be easily solved when one takes into account the discretionary powers -belonging to many judges- to interpret the rules creating new rights, and the cases in which remedies precede rights. At any rate, ferrajoli rejects the so-called counter majoritarian objection outlining that the basic foundation of the judge’s role is not a popular election, but relies upon the judge’s compliance with the lawLos aspectos de la obra de L. Ferrajoli que más atraen la atención de los procesalistas son los relacionados con la administración de justicia y los caracteres de la jurisdicción. El punto de partida fundamental queda fijado por ferrajoli al subrayar que la jurisdicción es una garantía secundaria para asegurar la protección judicial de los derechos. Y esta garantía tiene que ser general, ya que ningún derecho existe realmente sin una protección efectiva por parte de los tribunales En el contexto judicial, la justicia resulta bien administrada cuando las normas jurídicas se aplican correctamente y la verdad de los hechos en disputa se determina de acuerdo con las pruebas, tal como pretende la teoría clásica de la toma de decisiones judiciales. Sin embargo, pueden plantearse aquí algunos problemas (que son fácilmente resolubles), si tomamos en consideración los poderes discrecionales —que tienen muchos jueces— para interpretar las normas creando nuevos derechos y los casos en que remedies precede rights. En cualquier caso, ferrajoli rechaza la denominada objeción contra-mayoritaria, subrayando que la fundamentación principal del papel de los jueces no radica en su elección popular sino en su actuación de acuerdo con el Derecho. Editorial2019-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtículo revisado por paresapplication/pdfhttps://revistadigital.uce.edu.ec/index.php/CAP/article/view/195710.29166/cap.v3i4.1957REVISTA CAP JURÍDICA CENTRAL; Vol. 3 Núm. 4 (2019): CAP Jurídica; 275-2962550-6595reponame:Revista CAP Jurídica centralinstname:Universidad Central del Ecuadorinstacron:UCEspahttps://revistadigital.uce.edu.ec/index.php/CAP/article/view/1957/1832Derechos de autor 2019 REVISTA CAP JURÍDICA CENTRALinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2020-01-23T15:30:12Zoai:revistadigital.uce.edu.ec:article/1957Portal de revistashttps://revistadigital.uce.edu.ec/Universidad públicahttps://uce.edu.ec/**Ecuador*2600-60142600-6014opendoar:02020-01-23T15:30:12Revista CAP Jurídica central - Universidad Central del Ecuadorfalse
spellingShingle Leyendo a Ferrajoli: Consideraciones sobre la jurisdicción
Taruffo, Michele
Ferrajoli
jurisdicción
poderes discrecionales
Ferrajoli
jurisdiction
Discretionary powers
status_str publishedVersion
title Leyendo a Ferrajoli: Consideraciones sobre la jurisdicción
title_full Leyendo a Ferrajoli: Consideraciones sobre la jurisdicción
title_fullStr Leyendo a Ferrajoli: Consideraciones sobre la jurisdicción
title_full_unstemmed Leyendo a Ferrajoli: Consideraciones sobre la jurisdicción
title_short Leyendo a Ferrajoli: Consideraciones sobre la jurisdicción
title_sort Leyendo a Ferrajoli: Consideraciones sobre la jurisdicción
topic Ferrajoli
jurisdicción
poderes discrecionales
Ferrajoli
jurisdiction
Discretionary powers
url https://revistadigital.uce.edu.ec/index.php/CAP/article/view/1957