Leyendo a Ferrajoli: Consideraciones sobre la jurisdicción
The proceduralist’s attention is attracted mainly by the aspects of ferrajoli’s work dealing with the administration of justice and the characters of jurisdiction. The basic starting point is when ferrajoli stresses that jurisdiction is a secundary guarantee ensuring the judicial protection of right...
Na minha lista:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | article |
| Idioma: | spa |
| Publicado em: |
2019
|
| Assuntos: | |
| Acesso em linha: | https://revistadigital.uce.edu.ec/index.php/CAP/article/view/1957 |
| Tags: |
Adicionar Tag
Sem tags, seja o primeiro a adicionar uma tag!
|
| _version_ | 1858479062038609920 |
|---|---|
| author | Taruffo, Michele |
| author_facet | Taruffo, Michele |
| author_role | author |
| collection | Revista CAP Jurídica central |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv | Taruffo, Michele |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv | 2019-08-01 |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv | application/pdf |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv | https://revistadigital.uce.edu.ec/index.php/CAP/article/view/1957 10.29166/cap.v3i4.1957 |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv | spa |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv | Editorial |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv | https://revistadigital.uce.edu.ec/index.php/CAP/article/view/1957/1832 |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv | Derechos de autor 2019 REVISTA CAP JURÍDICA CENTRAL info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv | REVISTA CAP JURÍDICA CENTRAL; Vol. 3 Núm. 4 (2019): CAP Jurídica; 275-296 2550-6595 reponame:Revista CAP Jurídica central instname:Universidad Central del Ecuador instacron:UCE |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv | Ferrajoli jurisdicción poderes discrecionales Ferrajoli jurisdiction Discretionary powers |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv | Leyendo a Ferrajoli: Consideraciones sobre la jurisdicción |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv | info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artículo revisado por pares |
| description | The proceduralist’s attention is attracted mainly by the aspects of ferrajoli’s work dealing with the administration of justice and the characters of jurisdiction. The basic starting point is when ferrajoli stresses that jurisdiction is a secundary guarantee ensuring the judicial protection of rights. Such a guarantee has to be general, since no right actually exists without an effective protection offered by courts. In judicial contexts, justice is properly administered when legal rules are correctly applied, and the truth of the facts in issue is established, according to evidence and proof, as the classical theory of judicial decision-making claims. Some problems may arise, however, but may be easily solved when one takes into account the discretionary powers -belonging to many judges- to interpret the rules creating new rights, and the cases in which remedies precede rights. At any rate, ferrajoli rejects the so-called counter majoritarian objection outlining that the basic foundation of the judge’s role is not a popular election, but relies upon the judge’s compliance with the law |
| eu_rights_str_mv | openAccess |
| format | article |
| id | REVCAP_d8579ca963ed7eb2bf528b3e447c9d22 |
| identifier_str_mv | 10.29166/cap.v3i4.1957 |
| instacron_str | UCE |
| institution | UCE |
| instname_str | Universidad Central del Ecuador |
| language | spa |
| network_acronym_str | REVCAP |
| network_name_str | Revista CAP Jurídica central |
| oai_identifier_str | oai:revistadigital.uce.edu.ec:article/1957 |
| publishDate | 2019 |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv | Editorial |
| reponame_str | Revista CAP Jurídica central |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv | * |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv | Revista CAP Jurídica central - Universidad Central del Ecuador |
| repository_id_str | 0 |
| rights_invalid_str_mv | Derechos de autor 2019 REVISTA CAP JURÍDICA CENTRAL |
| spelling | Leyendo a Ferrajoli: Consideraciones sobre la jurisdicciónTaruffo, Michele Ferrajolijurisdicciónpoderes discrecionalesFerrajolijurisdictionDiscretionary powersThe proceduralist’s attention is attracted mainly by the aspects of ferrajoli’s work dealing with the administration of justice and the characters of jurisdiction. The basic starting point is when ferrajoli stresses that jurisdiction is a secundary guarantee ensuring the judicial protection of rights. Such a guarantee has to be general, since no right actually exists without an effective protection offered by courts. In judicial contexts, justice is properly administered when legal rules are correctly applied, and the truth of the facts in issue is established, according to evidence and proof, as the classical theory of judicial decision-making claims. Some problems may arise, however, but may be easily solved when one takes into account the discretionary powers -belonging to many judges- to interpret the rules creating new rights, and the cases in which remedies precede rights. At any rate, ferrajoli rejects the so-called counter majoritarian objection outlining that the basic foundation of the judge’s role is not a popular election, but relies upon the judge’s compliance with the lawLos aspectos de la obra de L. Ferrajoli que más atraen la atención de los procesalistas son los relacionados con la administración de justicia y los caracteres de la jurisdicción. El punto de partida fundamental queda fijado por ferrajoli al subrayar que la jurisdicción es una garantía secundaria para asegurar la protección judicial de los derechos. Y esta garantía tiene que ser general, ya que ningún derecho existe realmente sin una protección efectiva por parte de los tribunales En el contexto judicial, la justicia resulta bien administrada cuando las normas jurídicas se aplican correctamente y la verdad de los hechos en disputa se determina de acuerdo con las pruebas, tal como pretende la teoría clásica de la toma de decisiones judiciales. Sin embargo, pueden plantearse aquí algunos problemas (que son fácilmente resolubles), si tomamos en consideración los poderes discrecionales —que tienen muchos jueces— para interpretar las normas creando nuevos derechos y los casos en que remedies precede rights. En cualquier caso, ferrajoli rechaza la denominada objeción contra-mayoritaria, subrayando que la fundamentación principal del papel de los jueces no radica en su elección popular sino en su actuación de acuerdo con el Derecho. Editorial2019-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtículo revisado por paresapplication/pdfhttps://revistadigital.uce.edu.ec/index.php/CAP/article/view/195710.29166/cap.v3i4.1957REVISTA CAP JURÍDICA CENTRAL; Vol. 3 Núm. 4 (2019): CAP Jurídica; 275-2962550-6595reponame:Revista CAP Jurídica centralinstname:Universidad Central del Ecuadorinstacron:UCEspahttps://revistadigital.uce.edu.ec/index.php/CAP/article/view/1957/1832Derechos de autor 2019 REVISTA CAP JURÍDICA CENTRALinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2020-01-23T15:30:12Zoai:revistadigital.uce.edu.ec:article/1957Portal de revistashttps://revistadigital.uce.edu.ec/Universidad públicahttps://uce.edu.ec/**Ecuador*2600-60142600-6014opendoar:02020-01-23T15:30:12Revista CAP Jurídica central - Universidad Central del Ecuadorfalse |
| spellingShingle | Leyendo a Ferrajoli: Consideraciones sobre la jurisdicción Taruffo, Michele Ferrajoli jurisdicción poderes discrecionales Ferrajoli jurisdiction Discretionary powers |
| status_str | publishedVersion |
| title | Leyendo a Ferrajoli: Consideraciones sobre la jurisdicción |
| title_full | Leyendo a Ferrajoli: Consideraciones sobre la jurisdicción |
| title_fullStr | Leyendo a Ferrajoli: Consideraciones sobre la jurisdicción |
| title_full_unstemmed | Leyendo a Ferrajoli: Consideraciones sobre la jurisdicción |
| title_short | Leyendo a Ferrajoli: Consideraciones sobre la jurisdicción |
| title_sort | Leyendo a Ferrajoli: Consideraciones sobre la jurisdicción |
| topic | Ferrajoli jurisdicción poderes discrecionales Ferrajoli jurisdiction Discretionary powers |
| url | https://revistadigital.uce.edu.ec/index.php/CAP/article/view/1957 |