The evaluation of university research in Spain

This article analyzes the current duopoly of the companies that manage the rankings of publications and how this dynamic affects the public university, in general, as well as the system of accreditation for faculty researcher in Spain. The critical reflection on the causes and consequences of this b...

Volledige beschrijving

Bewaard in:
Bibliografische gegevens
Hoofdauteur: Jorge Alonso, Ana (author)
Andere auteurs: de Frutos, Ruth (author)
Formaat: article
Taal:spa
Gepubliceerd in: 2016
Onderwerpen:
Online toegang:https://revistachasqui.org/index.php/chasqui/article/view/2924
Tags: Voeg label toe
Geen labels, Wees de eerste die dit record labelt!
_version_ 1859067482000588800
author Jorge Alonso, Ana
author2 de Frutos, Ruth
author2_role author
author_facet Jorge Alonso, Ana
de Frutos, Ruth
author_role author
collection Revista CHASQUI
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Jorge Alonso, Ana
de Frutos, Ruth
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-12-31
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://revistachasqui.org/index.php/chasqui/article/view/2924
10.16921/chasqui.v0i133.2924
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv CIESPAL
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistachasqui.org/index.php/chasqui/article/view/2924/pdf
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv Derechos de autor 2016 Ana Jorge Alonso, Ruth de Frutos
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Chasqui. Revista Latinoamericana de Comunicación; Núm. 133 (2016): Capitalismo Cognitivo y Comunicología. La subsunción del trabajo intelectual; 159 - 172
Chasqui. Revista Latinoamericana de Comunicación; n. 133 (2016): Capitalismo Cognitivo y Comunicología. La subsunción del trabajo intelectual; 159 - 172
Chasqui. Revista Latinoamericana de Comunicación; N.º 133 (2016): Capitalismo Cognitivo y Comunicología. La subsunción del trabajo intelectual; 159 - 172
1390-924X
1390-1079
10.16921/chasqui.v0i133
reponame:Revista CHASQUI
instname:Revista CHASQUI
instacron:Revista CHASQUI
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv evaluation
quality of research
meritocracy
power
evaluación
calidad de la investigación
meritocracia
poder
Comunicación
avaliação
qualidade de investigação
meritocracia
poder
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The evaluation of university research in Spain
La evaluación de la investigación universitaria en España
A avaliação da pesquisa universitária em Espanha
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
description This article analyzes the current duopoly of the companies that manage the rankings of publications and how this dynamic affects the public university, in general, as well as the system of accreditation for faculty researcher in Spain. The critical reflection on the causes and consequences of this biased assessment model evidences collision between the political and academic imaginaries which promote hegemony of science over social sciences. In the same way, it reveals a geostrategic logic over representing scientific literature in English and a propensity for quantitative aspects in the global publishing trend.
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
format article
id REVCHASQUI_01a121577673f5d7d8a0f5e8e5ea5fec
identifier_str_mv 10.16921/chasqui.v0i133.2924
instacron_str Revista CHASQUI
institution Revista CHASQUI
instname_str Revista CHASQUI
language spa
network_acronym_str REVCHASQUI
network_name_str Revista CHASQUI
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.www.ciespal.org:article/2924
publishDate 2016
publisher.none.fl_str_mv CIESPAL
reponame_str Revista CHASQUI
repository.mail.fl_str_mv .
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista CHASQUI - Revista CHASQUI
repository_id_str 0
rights_invalid_str_mv Derechos de autor 2016 Ana Jorge Alonso, Ruth de Frutos
spelling The evaluation of university research in SpainLa evaluación de la investigación universitaria en EspañaA avaliação da pesquisa universitária em EspanhaJorge Alonso, Anade Frutos, Ruthevaluationquality of researchmeritocracypowerevaluacióncalidad de la investigaciónmeritocraciapoderComunicaciónavaliaçãoqualidade de investigaçãomeritocraciapoderThis article analyzes the current duopoly of the companies that manage the rankings of publications and how this dynamic affects the public university, in general, as well as the system of accreditation for faculty researcher in Spain. The critical reflection on the causes and consequences of this biased assessment model evidences collision between the political and academic imaginaries which promote hegemony of science over social sciences. In the same way, it reveals a geostrategic logic over representing scientific literature in English and a propensity for quantitative aspects in the global publishing trend.El presente artículo analiza el actual duopolio de las empresas que gestionan los rankings de las publicaciones y cómo esta dinámica afecta a la Universidad pública en general y al sistema de acreditación del profesorado investigador en España. La reflexión crítica sobre las causas y consecuencias de este modelo de evaluación no neutral evidencia colisiones entre los imaginarios políticos y académicos que promueven una hegemonía de las ciencias sobre las ciencias sociales, así como lógicas geoestratégicas que hiperrepresentan la literatura científica en lengua inglesa y la propensión hacia aspectos cuantitativistas en la tendencia editorial global.Este artigo analisa o duopólio atual das empresas que administram o ranking das publicações e como essa dinâmica influencia a Universidade pública em geral e o sistema de acreditação do pesquisador docente em Espanha em particular. A reflexão crítica sobre as causas e as consequências deste modelo de avaliação não neutral prova as colisões entre os imaginários políticos e acadêmicos que promovem a hegemonia da ciência sobre as ciências sociais e lógica geoestratégica que hiperrepresentam a literatura científica em Inglês e uma propensão para aspectos quantitativistas na tendência global de publicação.CIESPAL2016-12-31info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistachasqui.org/index.php/chasqui/article/view/292410.16921/chasqui.v0i133.2924Chasqui. Revista Latinoamericana de Comunicación; Núm. 133 (2016): Capitalismo Cognitivo y Comunicología. La subsunción del trabajo intelectual; 159 - 172Chasqui. Revista Latinoamericana de Comunicación; n. 133 (2016): Capitalismo Cognitivo y Comunicología. La subsunción del trabajo intelectual; 159 - 172Chasqui. Revista Latinoamericana de Comunicación; N.º 133 (2016): Capitalismo Cognitivo y Comunicología. La subsunción del trabajo intelectual; 159 - 1721390-924X1390-107910.16921/chasqui.v0i133reponame:Revista CHASQUIinstname:Revista CHASQUIinstacron:Revista CHASQUIspahttps://revistachasqui.org/index.php/chasqui/article/view/2924/pdfDerechos de autor 2016 Ana Jorge Alonso, Ruth de Frutosinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2018-06-26T14:48:50Zoai:ojs.www.ciespal.org:article/2924Portal de revistashttps://revistachasqui.org/Organismo científico-tecnológicohttps://revistachasqui.org/..Ecuador.1390-924X1390-1079opendoar:02018-06-26T14:48:50Revista CHASQUI - Revista CHASQUIfalse
spellingShingle The evaluation of university research in Spain
Jorge Alonso, Ana
evaluation
quality of research
meritocracy
power
evaluación
calidad de la investigación
meritocracia
poder
Comunicación
avaliação
qualidade de investigação
meritocracia
poder
status_str publishedVersion
title The evaluation of university research in Spain
title_full The evaluation of university research in Spain
title_fullStr The evaluation of university research in Spain
title_full_unstemmed The evaluation of university research in Spain
title_short The evaluation of university research in Spain
title_sort The evaluation of university research in Spain
topic evaluation
quality of research
meritocracy
power
evaluación
calidad de la investigación
meritocracia
poder
Comunicación
avaliação
qualidade de investigação
meritocracia
poder
url https://revistachasqui.org/index.php/chasqui/article/view/2924