Preterm Labor: nifedipine vs atosiban treatment. Bilbiographic theoretical review
Background: The threat of preterm birth is a global and national public health problem. Prematurity is linked to complications such as pulmonary immaturity and central nervous system lesions, which require timely treatment. Objective: To perform an objective comparison of the results of the treatmen...
Збережено в:
| Автор: | |
|---|---|
| Інші автори: | , |
| Формат: | article |
| Мова: | spa |
| Опубліковано: |
2022
|
| Предмети: | |
| Онлайн доступ: | https://revistadigital.uce.edu.ec/index.php/CIENCIAS_MEDICAS/article/view/3266 |
| Теги: |
Додати тег
Немає тегів, Будьте першим, хто поставить тег для цього запису!
|
Додати тег | _version_ | 1859105414024527872 |
|---|---|
| author | Tamayo-Barrionuevo , Diana |
| author2 | Hernández-Guijarro , Fernando López-Mayorga, Alberto |
| author2_role | author author |
| author_facet | Tamayo-Barrionuevo , Diana Hernández-Guijarro , Fernando López-Mayorga, Alberto |
| author_role | author |
| collection | Revista Ciencias Médicas |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv | Tamayo-Barrionuevo , Diana Hernández-Guijarro , Fernando López-Mayorga, Alberto |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv | 2022-01-01 |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv | application/pdf |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv | https://revistadigital.uce.edu.ec/index.php/CIENCIAS_MEDICAS/article/view/3266 10.29166/rfcmq.v47i2.3266 |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv | spa |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv | Quito: Universidad Central del Ecuador |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv | https://revistadigital.uce.edu.ec/index.php/CIENCIAS_MEDICAS/article/view/3266/6602 |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv | Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Médicas (Quito); Vol. 47 No. 2 (2022): Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Médicas (Quito); 51 - 66 Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Médicas (Quito); Vol. 47 Núm. 2 (2022): Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Médicas (Quito); 51 - 66 2737-6141 2588-0691 reponame:Revista Ciencias Médicas instname:Universidad Central del Ecuador instacron:UCE |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv | trabajo de parto prematuro tocólisis nifedipino eficacia obstetric labor premature tocolysis nifedipine efficacy |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv | Preterm Labor: nifedipine vs atosiban treatment. Bilbiographic theoretical review Parto Prematuro: Tratamiento con nifedipino versus atosiban. Revisión Bibliográfica Teórica |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv | info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Artículo evaluado por pares |
| description | Background: The threat of preterm birth is a global and national public health problem. Prematurity is linked to complications such as pulmonary immaturity and central nervous system lesions, which require timely treatment. Objective: To perform an objective comparison of the results of the treatment of the threat of premature delivery, using nifedipine or atosiban, carrying out an updated theoretical review of the subject, to offer the scientific community a tool for research on a frequent subject of high maternal and fetal risk. Materials y Methods: There was a bibliographic search in specialized databases. Articles published in high impact indexed journals in the last 5 years were included. The quality of the articles included was assessed, using the Sacket methodology, and the risk of bias, according to the Cochrane methodology. Results: There was an agreement among the authors consulted there are no significant differences in the tocolytic effect of atosiban and nifedipine. Conclusions: The academic literature seems to agree that the effectiveness of atosiban and nifedipine as tocolytic agents is similar, with both drugs prolonging pregnancy with the risk of preterm delivery, which is the fundamental purpose of tocolysis. |
| eu_rights_str_mv | openAccess |
| format | article |
| id | REVCMED_753f099a475e8ee2a42288ef5cdfea9d |
| identifier_str_mv | 10.29166/rfcmq.v47i2.3266 |
| instacron_str | UCE |
| institution | UCE |
| instname_str | Universidad Central del Ecuador |
| language | spa |
| network_acronym_str | REVCMED |
| network_name_str | Revista Ciencias Médicas |
| oai_identifier_str | oai:revistadigital.uce.edu.ec:article/3266 |
| publishDate | 2022 |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv | Quito: Universidad Central del Ecuador |
| reponame_str | Revista Ciencias Médicas |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv | * |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv | Revista Ciencias Médicas - Universidad Central del Ecuador |
| repository_id_str | * |
| rights_invalid_str_mv | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
| spelling | Preterm Labor: nifedipine vs atosiban treatment. Bilbiographic theoretical reviewParto Prematuro: Tratamiento con nifedipino versus atosiban. Revisión Bibliográfica TeóricaTamayo-Barrionuevo , DianaHernández-Guijarro , FernandoLópez-Mayorga, Albertotrabajo de parto prematurotocólisisnifedipinoeficaciaobstetric labor prematuretocolysisnifedipineefficacyBackground: The threat of preterm birth is a global and national public health problem. Prematurity is linked to complications such as pulmonary immaturity and central nervous system lesions, which require timely treatment. Objective: To perform an objective comparison of the results of the treatment of the threat of premature delivery, using nifedipine or atosiban, carrying out an updated theoretical review of the subject, to offer the scientific community a tool for research on a frequent subject of high maternal and fetal risk. Materials y Methods: There was a bibliographic search in specialized databases. Articles published in high impact indexed journals in the last 5 years were included. The quality of the articles included was assessed, using the Sacket methodology, and the risk of bias, according to the Cochrane methodology. Results: There was an agreement among the authors consulted there are no significant differences in the tocolytic effect of atosiban and nifedipine. Conclusions: The academic literature seems to agree that the effectiveness of atosiban and nifedipine as tocolytic agents is similar, with both drugs prolonging pregnancy with the risk of preterm delivery, which is the fundamental purpose of tocolysis.Introducción: La amenaza de parto pretérmino es un problema de salud pública mundial y nacional. La prematuridad viene acompañada de complicaciones como inmadurez pulmonar y lesiones del sistema nervioso central, que requieren de tratamiento oportuno. Objetivo: Establecer una comparación objetiva de los resultados del tratamiento de la amenaza de parto prematuro, mediante el uso de Nifedipina o Atosiban, realizando una revisión teórica actualizada del tema, con el propósito de ofrecer a la comunidad científica, una herramienta de consulta, sobre un tema frecuente y de alto riesgo materno fetal. Materiales y Métodos: Se realizó una búsqueda bibliográfica en las bases de datos: Google Scholar, Pubmed, Wiley Online Library, Biomed, Scopus, Medes, Medline, Pro Quest, Gale, Scopus, y ScIELO, Se incluyeron artículos publicados en revistas indexadas de alto impacto, en los últimos 5 años. Se valoró la calidad de los artículos incluidos, utilizando la metodología de Sacket, y el riesgo de sesgo, según la metodología Cochrane. Resultados: Se observó un consenso entre los autores consultados en que no existen diferencias significativas en el efecto tocolítico de atosiban y nifedipino Conclusiones: La literatura académica parece coincidir en que la efectividad de atosiban y nifedipino como agentes tocolíticos es similar, con ambos medicamentos se consigue prolongar el embarazo con riesgo de parto pretérmino, que es el propósito fundamental de la tocolisis.Quito: Universidad Central del Ecuador2022-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtículo evaluado por paresapplication/pdfhttps://revistadigital.uce.edu.ec/index.php/CIENCIAS_MEDICAS/article/view/326610.29166/rfcmq.v47i2.3266Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Médicas (Quito); Vol. 47 No. 2 (2022): Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Médicas (Quito); 51 - 66Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Médicas (Quito); Vol. 47 Núm. 2 (2022): Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Médicas (Quito); 51 - 662737-61412588-0691reponame:Revista Ciencias Médicasinstname:Universidad Central del Ecuadorinstacron:UCEspahttps://revistadigital.uce.edu.ec/index.php/CIENCIAS_MEDICAS/article/view/3266/6602Derechos de autor 2022 DIANA CAROLINA TAMAYO B., FERNANDO BOLIVAR HERNANDEZ GUIJARRO , ALBERTO LOPEZ MAYORGAhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-09-15T14:46:51Zoai:revistadigital.uce.edu.ec:article/3266Portal de revistashttps://revistadigital.uce.edu.ec/Universidad públicahttps://uce.edu.ec/**Ecuador*2737-61412588-0691opendoar:*2023-09-15T14:46:51Revista Ciencias Médicas - Universidad Central del Ecuadorfalse |
| spellingShingle | Preterm Labor: nifedipine vs atosiban treatment. Bilbiographic theoretical review Tamayo-Barrionuevo , Diana trabajo de parto prematuro tocólisis nifedipino eficacia obstetric labor premature tocolysis nifedipine efficacy |
| status_str | publishedVersion |
| title | Preterm Labor: nifedipine vs atosiban treatment. Bilbiographic theoretical review |
| title_full | Preterm Labor: nifedipine vs atosiban treatment. Bilbiographic theoretical review |
| title_fullStr | Preterm Labor: nifedipine vs atosiban treatment. Bilbiographic theoretical review |
| title_full_unstemmed | Preterm Labor: nifedipine vs atosiban treatment. Bilbiographic theoretical review |
| title_short | Preterm Labor: nifedipine vs atosiban treatment. Bilbiographic theoretical review |
| title_sort | Preterm Labor: nifedipine vs atosiban treatment. Bilbiographic theoretical review |
| topic | trabajo de parto prematuro tocólisis nifedipino eficacia obstetric labor premature tocolysis nifedipine efficacy |
| url | https://revistadigital.uce.edu.ec/index.php/CIENCIAS_MEDICAS/article/view/3266 |