Oh Canadá
Those of us working in international monetary theory have been wondering for a decade when Robert Mundell would receive his well-deserved Nobel Prize in Economic Sciences. In this field, the contribution of the Canadian economist is so important, so “seminal” - a widely used adjective, but really ap...
Saved in:
| 主要作者: | |
|---|---|
| 格式: | article |
| 语言: | spa |
| 出版: |
2000
|
| 主题: | |
| 在线阅读: | https://estudioseconomicos.bce.fin.ec/index.php/RevistaCE/article/view/194 |
| 标签: |
添加标签
没有标签, 成为第一个标记此记录!
|
添加标签 | 总结: | Those of us working in international monetary theory have been wondering for a decade when Robert Mundell would receive his well-deserved Nobel Prize in Economic Sciences. In this field, the contribution of the Canadian economist is so important, so “seminal” - a widely used adjective, but really appropriate in this case - that in many controversial aspects his ideas are the basis of all discussion. However, a layman might be confused about the exact reasons why Mundell received his award. Almost pathetically the editorial page of The Wall Street Journal has declared that this is a Nobel for "the supply side". There is no reason to be surprised: Robert Bartley, the publisher, tries to argue that intellectual exoneration has been a nearly desperate goal lately. After eight years of "Clintonian" expansion that makes Reagan's "seven fat years" wrinkled, and full of silly-looking supply theories, like Jude. Wanniski, The Wall Street Journal would accept whatever is at hand. |
|---|