The dogmatics of crimes of danger and its application in the crime of incompatible negotiation. An analysis from the jurisprudence of the Supreme Court of Justice of the Republic of Peru
This article aims to determine when the crime of incompatible negotiation —regulated within Title XVIII, in article 399 of the Penal Code— is consummated from a study of the dogmatics of dangerous crimes. Subsequently, it will be analyzed whether the jurisprudence of the Supreme Court of Justice of...
Gorde:
| Egile nagusia: | |
|---|---|
| Formatua: | article |
| Hizkuntza: | spa |
| Argitaratua: |
2023
|
| Gaiak: | |
| Sarrera elektronikoa: | https://revistadigital.uce.edu.ec/index.php/derechopenal/article/view/4865 |
| Etiketak: |
Etiketa erantsi
Etiketarik gabe, Izan zaitez lehena erregistro honi etiketa jartzen!
|
| Gaia: | This article aims to determine when the crime of incompatible negotiation —regulated within Title XVIII, in article 399 of the Penal Code— is consummated from a study of the dogmatics of dangerous crimes. Subsequently, it will be analyzed whether the jurisprudence of the Supreme Court of Justice of Peru is correctly interpreting the moment of consummation of this crime that seeks to punish «the official or public servant who, improperly, directly or indirectly or through a simulated act, he is interested, for his own benefit or that of a third party, in any contract or operation in which he intervenes by reason of his position». |
|---|