The Roldós Doctrine’s Contributions to International Relations: Tensions Between State Sovereignty and Non-Intervention Versus Human Rights
This article addresses the normative tension between the principles of state sovereignty and non-intervention, on the one hand, and the defense of human rights, on the other, from a historical, international and regional perspective. Using the historical-critical method, three key periods of these t...
保存先:
| 第一著者: | |
|---|---|
| その他の著者: | |
| フォーマット: | article |
| 言語: | spa |
| 出版事項: |
2025
|
| 主題: | |
| オンライン･アクセス: | https://revistas.iaen.edu.ec/index.php/estado_comunes/article/view/389 |
| タグ: |
タグ追加
タグなし, このレコードへの初めてのタグを付けませんか!
|
タグ追加 | 要約: | This article addresses the normative tension between the principles of state sovereignty and non-intervention, on the one hand, and the defense of human rights, on the other, from a historical, international and regional perspective. Using the historical-critical method, three key periods of these tensions were analyzed: the Cold War, the military dictatorships of the 1970s and 1980s, as well as the post–Cold War era. The findings reveal that Latin America has contributed to the international debate on human rights and that the Roldós doctrine is a proposal for regional integration that places human rights defense as a universal principle. In conclusion, the Roldós doctrine represents a contribution to foreign policy, ignored by academic debates. Latin America is a scenario of theoretical contributions that, if considered, would challenge the Eurocentric narrative of international relations. |
|---|