Termination of the Contract for Intrinsic and Extrinsic Reasons. A Unitary or Differentiated Regime of Effects?

This paper addresses the question of the reasonableness of a unitary system of effects for contractual termination in a broad sense, encompassing both intrinsic and extrinsic causes. To this end, it undertakes a comparative analysis of the regulation of the effects of nullity and termination for bre...

وصف كامل

محفوظ في:
التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
المؤلف الرئيسي: Momberg Uribe, Rodrigo (author)
مؤلفون آخرون: Severin Fuster, Gonzalo (author)
التنسيق: article
اللغة:spa
منشور في: 2025
الموضوعات:
الوصول للمادة أونلاين:https://revistas.uasb.edu.ec/index.php/foro/article/view/5507
الوسوم: إضافة وسم
لا توجد وسوم, كن أول من يضع وسما على هذه التسجيلة!
الوصف
الملخص:This paper addresses the question of the reasonableness of a unitary system of effects for contractual termination in a broad sense, encompassing both intrinsic and extrinsic causes. To this end, it undertakes a comparative analysis of the regulation of the effects of nullity and termination for breach in two normative models: one “traditional”, the Civil Code of Bello, and the other “modern”, the UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts. The conclusion suggests that maintaining a differentiated regime, as both texts do, is appropriate. Consequently, doctrinally supporting such a broad notion of “contractual termination” proves neither useful as a basis for a conceptual framework nor as a foundation for a normative regime.