Ecuador’s Great Current Debt: The Sarayaku Case

The case of the Kichwa Sarayaku people vs. Ecuador is one of the most iconic and vindicatory of the Inter-American Human Rights System in rela-tion to the recognition of the violation of collective rights, specifically the right to prior, free, and informed consultation with indigenous peoples and c...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. Verfasser: Veintimilla Quezada, Silvia (author)
Weitere Verfasser: Chacón Coronado, Mary Elizabeth (author)
Format: article
Sprache:spa
Veröffentlicht: 2023
Schlagworte:
Online Zugang:https://revistas.uasb.edu.ec/index.php/foro/article/view/3868
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
_version_ 1859122167321460736
author Veintimilla Quezada, Silvia
author2 Chacón Coronado, Mary Elizabeth
author2_role author
author_facet Veintimilla Quezada, Silvia
Chacón Coronado, Mary Elizabeth
author_role author
collection Revista FORO: REVISTA DE DERECHO
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Veintimilla Quezada, Silvia
Chacón Coronado, Mary Elizabeth
Veintimilla Quezada, Silvia
Chacón Coronado, Mary Elizabeth
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-01-05
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
text/html
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.uasb.edu.ec/index.php/foro/article/view/3868
10.32719/26312484.2023.39.2
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Andina Simón Bolívar, Sede Ecuador.
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://revistas.uasb.edu.ec/index.php/foro/article/view/3868/3819
https://revistas.uasb.edu.ec/index.php/foro/article/view/3868/4039
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Foro: Law Journal; No. 39 (2023): Human Rights, Rights of Nature & Business: Perspectives and Challenges in the 21st Century; 25-42
Foro: Revista de Derecho; Núm. 39 (2023): Derechos humanos, derechos de la naturaleza y empresas: Perspectivas y desafíos del siglo XXI; 25-42
2631-2484
1390-2466
reponame:Revista FORO: REVISTA DE DERECHO
instname:Universidad Andina Simón Bolivar
instacron:UASB
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv State
Nature
Plurinationality
Human rights
Collective rights
Judgment
Right to consultation
Indigenous people
Estado
naturaleza
Plurinacionalidad
Derechos Humanos
Derechos Colectivos
Derecho a la consulta
Pueblos indígenas
Sentencia
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Ecuador’s Great Current Debt: The Sarayaku Case
La gran deuda vigente de Ecuador: el caso Sarayaku
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
description The case of the Kichwa Sarayaku people vs. Ecuador is one of the most iconic and vindicatory of the Inter-American Human Rights System in rela-tion to the recognition of the violation of collective rights, specifically the right to prior, free, and informed consultation with indigenous peoples and communities on activities that put their lives or territories at risk. In this sense, the purpose of this research is to expose the contextual and legal reasons that led to this international dispute, in order to contribute to the legal debate that is unfolding around the incomplete compliance with the judgment issued by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (IACHR) recognizing the international responsibility of the Ecuadorian State. For this purpose, a historical-political analysis of the background of the case has been developed in order to approach with a critical perspective the points of the sentence issued by the IACHR, which ten years after its issuance have still not been executed. The political, ideological, and economic preponderance dynamics have left aside elements inherent to the plurinational nature of the Ecuadorian State, such as the indigenous peoples ? worldview or nature as a guarantee for life. The Constitutional Court has the important responsibility of establishing a precedent on the application of internatio-nal standards on the protection of human rights, which fossil fuel compa-nies such as CGC (Compañía General de Combustibles) did not seem to have complied with.
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
format article
id REVFORO_89bd6370afab2bd37ebe02534ae4b668
identifier_str_mv 10.32719/26312484.2023.39.2
instacron_str UASB
institution UASB
instname_str Universidad Andina Simón Bolivar
language spa
network_acronym_str REVFORO
network_name_str Revista FORO: REVISTA DE DERECHO
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.uasb.edu.ec:article/3868
publishDate 2023
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidad Andina Simón Bolívar, Sede Ecuador.
reponame_str Revista FORO: REVISTA DE DERECHO
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista FORO: REVISTA DE DERECHO - Universidad Andina Simón Bolivar
repository_id_str 0
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0
spelling Ecuador’s Great Current Debt: The Sarayaku CaseLa gran deuda vigente de Ecuador: el caso SarayakuVeintimilla Quezada, SilviaChacón Coronado, Mary ElizabethVeintimilla Quezada, SilviaChacón Coronado, Mary ElizabethStateNaturePlurinationalityHuman rightsCollective rightsJudgmentRight to consultationIndigenous peopleEstadonaturalezaPlurinacionalidadDerechos HumanosDerechos ColectivosDerecho a la consultaPueblos indígenasSentenciaThe case of the Kichwa Sarayaku people vs. Ecuador is one of the most iconic and vindicatory of the Inter-American Human Rights System in rela-tion to the recognition of the violation of collective rights, specifically the right to prior, free, and informed consultation with indigenous peoples and communities on activities that put their lives or territories at risk. In this sense, the purpose of this research is to expose the contextual and legal reasons that led to this international dispute, in order to contribute to the legal debate that is unfolding around the incomplete compliance with the judgment issued by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (IACHR) recognizing the international responsibility of the Ecuadorian State. For this purpose, a historical-political analysis of the background of the case has been developed in order to approach with a critical perspective the points of the sentence issued by the IACHR, which ten years after its issuance have still not been executed. The political, ideological, and economic preponderance dynamics have left aside elements inherent to the plurinational nature of the Ecuadorian State, such as the indigenous peoples ? worldview or nature as a guarantee for life. The Constitutional Court has the important responsibility of establishing a precedent on the application of internatio-nal standards on the protection of human rights, which fossil fuel compa-nies such as CGC (Compañía General de Combustibles) did not seem to have complied with. El caso del pueblo Kichwa Sarayaku vs. Ecuador es uno de los más icónicos y reivindicatorios del Sistema Interamericano de Derechos Humanos en relación al reconocimiento de la vulneración de los derechos colectivos, específicamente el derecho a la consulta previa, libre e informada a los pueblos y comunidades indígenas sobre actividades que pongan en riesgo su vida o territorio. En este sentido el objeto de la presente investigación es exponer los motivos contextuales y jurídicos que llevaron a esta contienda internacional, para aportar en el debate jurídico que se desenvuelve en torno al incompleto cumplimiento de la sentencia emitida por la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos (Corte IDH) reconociendo la responsabilidad internacional del Estado ecuatoriano. Para ello se ha desarrollado un análisis histórico-político sobre los antecedentes del caso para abordar con perspectiva crítica los puntos resolutivos de la sentencia emitida por la Corte IDH, que diez años después de su emisión no han sido ejecutados.Las dinámicas políticas, ideológicas y de preponderancia económica han dejado de lado elementos inherentes a la característica plurinacionalidad del Estado ecuatoriano, como la cosmovisión de los pueblos indígenas o la naturaleza como garantía de vida. La Corte Constitucional tiene la importante responsabilidad de establecer un precedente sobre la aplicación de estándares internacionales sobre protección de derechos humanos, que empresas petroleras como CGC no cumplieron.Universidad Andina Simón Bolívar, Sede Ecuador.2023-01-05info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdftext/htmlhttps://revistas.uasb.edu.ec/index.php/foro/article/view/386810.32719/26312484.2023.39.2Foro: Law Journal; No. 39 (2023): Human Rights, Rights of Nature & Business: Perspectives and Challenges in the 21st Century; 25-42Foro: Revista de Derecho; Núm. 39 (2023): Derechos humanos, derechos de la naturaleza y empresas: Perspectivas y desafíos del siglo XXI; 25-422631-24841390-2466reponame:Revista FORO: REVISTA DE DERECHOinstname:Universidad Andina Simón Bolivarinstacron:UASBspahttps://revistas.uasb.edu.ec/index.php/foro/article/view/3868/3819https://revistas.uasb.edu.ec/index.php/foro/article/view/3868/4039https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-07-13T22:36:20Zoai:revistas.uasb.edu.ec:article/3868Portal de revistashttps://revistas.uasb.edu.ec/index.php/foroInstitución privadahttp://www.uasb.edu.ec/https://revistas.uasb.edu.ec/index.php/foro/oaiEcuador2631-24841390-2466opendoar:02023-07-13T22:36:20falsePortal de revistashttps://revistas.uasb.edu.ec/index.php/foroInstitución privadahttp://www.uasb.edu.ec/https://revistas.uasb.edu.ec/index.php/foro/oaiEcuador2631-24841390-2466opendoar:02023-07-13T22:36:20Revista FORO: REVISTA DE DERECHO - Universidad Andina Simón Bolivarfalse
spellingShingle Ecuador’s Great Current Debt: The Sarayaku Case
Veintimilla Quezada, Silvia
State
Nature
Plurinationality
Human rights
Collective rights
Judgment
Right to consultation
Indigenous people
Estado
naturaleza
Plurinacionalidad
Derechos Humanos
Derechos Colectivos
Derecho a la consulta
Pueblos indígenas
Sentencia
status_str publishedVersion
title Ecuador’s Great Current Debt: The Sarayaku Case
title_full Ecuador’s Great Current Debt: The Sarayaku Case
title_fullStr Ecuador’s Great Current Debt: The Sarayaku Case
title_full_unstemmed Ecuador’s Great Current Debt: The Sarayaku Case
title_short Ecuador’s Great Current Debt: The Sarayaku Case
title_sort Ecuador’s Great Current Debt: The Sarayaku Case
topic State
Nature
Plurinationality
Human rights
Collective rights
Judgment
Right to consultation
Indigenous people
Estado
naturaleza
Plurinacionalidad
Derechos Humanos
Derechos Colectivos
Derecho a la consulta
Pueblos indígenas
Sentencia
url https://revistas.uasb.edu.ec/index.php/foro/article/view/3868