Debates on conservation and protected areas: consolidated paradigms and new horizons
This article briefly analyzes the main theoretical discussions on nature conservation through protected areas. In a context of expansion and diversification of mechanisms to protect nature, such strategy stresses due to its precursor character and the magnitude and intensity of their territorial con...
Saved in:
| Hovedforfatter: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | article |
| Sprog: | spa |
| Udgivet: |
2015
|
| Fag: | |
| Online adgang: | https://revistas.flacsoandes.edu.ec/letrasverdes/article/view/1662 |
| Tags: |
Tilføj Tag
Ingen Tags, Vær først til at tagge denne postø!
|
| _version_ | 1859083693604208640 |
|---|---|
| author | D'Amico, María Paula |
| author_facet | D'Amico, María Paula |
| author_role | author |
| collection | Revista Letras Verdes |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv | D'Amico, María Paula |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv | 2015-09-17 |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv | application/pdf |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv | https://revistas.flacsoandes.edu.ec/letrasverdes/article/view/1662 10.17141/letrasverdes.18.2015.1662 |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv | spa |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv | FLACSO Ecuador |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv | https://revistas.flacsoandes.edu.ec/letrasverdes/article/view/1662/1359 |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv | Derechos de autor 2015 María Paula D´Amico info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv | Letras Verdes. Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios Socioambientales; No. 18 (2015): Letras Verdes 18; 208-226 Letras Verdes. Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios Socioambientales; Núm. 18 (2015): Letras Verdes 18 (Septiembre-Febrero); 208-226 1390-6631 10.17141/letrasverdes.18.2015 reponame:Revista Letras Verdes instname:Facultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales instacron:FLACSO |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv | áreas protegidas conservación de la naturaleza conservación autoritaria conservación comunitaria conservación neoliberal. protected areas biodiversity conservation fortress conservation community based conservation neoliberal conservation. |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv | Debates on conservation and protected areas: consolidated paradigms and new horizons Debates sobre conservación y áreas naturales protegidas: paradigmas consolidados y nuevos horizontes |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv | info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| description | This article briefly analyzes the main theoretical discussions on nature conservation through protected areas. In a context of expansion and diversification of mechanisms to protect nature, such strategy stresses due to its precursor character and the magnitude and intensity of their territorial consequences. Initially, we address the consolidated paradigms over nature conservation. On one hand, fortress conservation supports the idea of parks and natural reserves without humans. On the other, for community based conservation there is no need to evict or expel communities to achieve conservation goals. Without ignoring the uneven impacts that this two paradigms implies, both shows a moral condition over nature conservation and besides their differences are reduced on management terms. Aimed at broadening the analysis, we point out theoretical frames that explain conservation and their mechanisms within capitalism and are especially interested in unraveling the characteristics and dynamics assumed in the current neoliberal phase. Thus, conservation is a social issue where a diversity of interests converges rather than a simple concern about protecting nature. |
| eu_rights_str_mv | openAccess |
| format | article |
| id | REVLETRASV_112f1ba9ec410eebde6d4b3b8312ea3a |
| identifier_str_mv | 10.17141/letrasverdes.18.2015.1662 |
| instacron_str | FLACSO |
| institution | FLACSO |
| instname_str | Facultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales |
| language | spa |
| network_acronym_str | REVLETRASV |
| network_name_str | Revista Letras Verdes |
| oai_identifier_str | oai:revistas.flacsoandes.edu.ec:article/1662 |
| publishDate | 2015 |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv | FLACSO Ecuador |
| reponame_str | Revista Letras Verdes |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv | . |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv | Revista Letras Verdes - Facultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales |
| repository_id_str | 0 |
| rights_invalid_str_mv | Derechos de autor 2015 María Paula D´Amico |
| spelling | Debates on conservation and protected areas: consolidated paradigms and new horizonsDebates sobre conservación y áreas naturales protegidas: paradigmas consolidados y nuevos horizontesD'Amico, María Paulaáreas protegidasconservación de la naturalezaconservación autoritariaconservación comunitariaconservación neoliberal.protected areasbiodiversity conservationfortress conservationcommunity based conservationneoliberal conservation.This article briefly analyzes the main theoretical discussions on nature conservation through protected areas. In a context of expansion and diversification of mechanisms to protect nature, such strategy stresses due to its precursor character and the magnitude and intensity of their territorial consequences. Initially, we address the consolidated paradigms over nature conservation. On one hand, fortress conservation supports the idea of parks and natural reserves without humans. On the other, for community based conservation there is no need to evict or expel communities to achieve conservation goals. Without ignoring the uneven impacts that this two paradigms implies, both shows a moral condition over nature conservation and besides their differences are reduced on management terms. Aimed at broadening the analysis, we point out theoretical frames that explain conservation and their mechanisms within capitalism and are especially interested in unraveling the characteristics and dynamics assumed in the current neoliberal phase. Thus, conservation is a social issue where a diversity of interests converges rather than a simple concern about protecting nature. Este artículo analiza de manera sucinta las discusiones teóricas centrales sobre la conservación de la naturaleza en áreas naturales protegidas. En un escenario de expansión y diversificación de los mecanismos destinados a proteger la naturaleza, dicha estrategia se destaca debido a su carácter precursor y a la magnitud e intensidad de sus alcances territoriales. En primer término, se abordan los paradigmas consolidados en torno a la conservación. Por un lado, el modelo autoritario o estricto, que defiende la idea de parques y reservas sin presencia humana. Por el otro, la conservación comunitaria sostiene que los objetivos ambientales pueden alcanzarse sin expulsar a las comunidades o personas que habitan espacios protegidos. Sin desconocer las consecuencias disímiles que cada uno implica, ambos dejan traslucir un carácter moral sobre el cuidado de la naturaleza y las diferencias quedan reducidas a cuestiones de gestión. Tendiente a ampliar el horizonte de análisis, se recuperan contribuciones teóricas que sitúan y explican la conservación y sus mecanismos en el marco del capitalismo y se interesan por desentrañar las características y dinámicas que asume en la actual fase neoliberal. Así, se trata de un hecho social que condensa una diversidad de intereses antes que sólo una preocupación por el cuidado de la naturaleza.FLACSO Ecuador2015-09-17info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.flacsoandes.edu.ec/letrasverdes/article/view/166210.17141/letrasverdes.18.2015.1662Letras Verdes. Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios Socioambientales; No. 18 (2015): Letras Verdes 18; 208-226Letras Verdes. Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios Socioambientales; Núm. 18 (2015): Letras Verdes 18 (Septiembre-Febrero); 208-2261390-663110.17141/letrasverdes.18.2015reponame:Revista Letras Verdesinstname:Facultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Socialesinstacron:FLACSOspahttps://revistas.flacsoandes.edu.ec/letrasverdes/article/view/1662/1359Derechos de autor 2015 María Paula D´Amicoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2017-02-21T14:03:49Zoai:revistas.flacsoandes.edu.ec:article/1662Institucionalhttps://revistas.flacsoandes.edu.ec/letrasverdesUniversidad privadahttps://www.flacso.edu.ec..Ecuador.1390-66311390-6631opendoar:02017-02-21T14:03:49Revista Letras Verdes - Facultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Socialesfalse |
| spellingShingle | Debates on conservation and protected areas: consolidated paradigms and new horizons D'Amico, María Paula áreas protegidas conservación de la naturaleza conservación autoritaria conservación comunitaria conservación neoliberal. protected areas biodiversity conservation fortress conservation community based conservation neoliberal conservation. |
| status_str | publishedVersion |
| title | Debates on conservation and protected areas: consolidated paradigms and new horizons |
| title_full | Debates on conservation and protected areas: consolidated paradigms and new horizons |
| title_fullStr | Debates on conservation and protected areas: consolidated paradigms and new horizons |
| title_full_unstemmed | Debates on conservation and protected areas: consolidated paradigms and new horizons |
| title_short | Debates on conservation and protected areas: consolidated paradigms and new horizons |
| title_sort | Debates on conservation and protected areas: consolidated paradigms and new horizons |
| topic | áreas protegidas conservación de la naturaleza conservación autoritaria conservación comunitaria conservación neoliberal. protected areas biodiversity conservation fortress conservation community based conservation neoliberal conservation. |
| url | https://revistas.flacsoandes.edu.ec/letrasverdes/article/view/1662 |