Participatory Guarantee Systems in Ecuador. Approaches to its development

  This study examines Participatory Guarantee Systems (PGS) as an alternative to Third Party Certification (TPC). These schemes are characterized by its multi-stakeholder approach which relies on principles like participation, transparency and trust. This research, based on the logics of pr...

全面介绍

Saved in:
书目详细资料
主要作者: Pino Andrade, Mauricio (author)
格式: article
语言:spa
出版: 2017
主题:
在线阅读:https://revistas.flacsoandes.edu.ec/letrasverdes/article/view/2679
标签: 添加标签
没有标签, 成为第一个标记此记录!
实物特征
总结:  This study examines Participatory Guarantee Systems (PGS) as an alternative to Third Party Certification (TPC). These schemes are characterized by its multi-stakeholder approach which relies on principles like participation, transparency and trust. This research, based on the logics of process-tracing and comparative analysis, analyzed the experiences with PGS of the peasant’s network Red Ecovida from Brazil, and Ecuador’s experience. This study supports the idea that TPC created a normative trajectory that resulted in this scheme embedding the regulations on organics. Consequently, other systems than TPC are excluded from official recognition. The idea of norm diffusion through localization is also backed up in the analysis (from Brazil to Ecuador). This especially due to that PGS are better suited to the social, economic and environmental conditions of small-scale farmers. In the Ecuadorian case, PGS are meant as congruence builders (among the legal, political and productive grounds of the country), rather than just mechanisms of control. The main aim of PGS is to scale up agroecology by enhancing production, markets and consumption.