Accuracy of intraoral impressions: a literature review
Intraoral fingerprints can vary in precision and accuracy, depending on the scanner used. These parameters have not been studied in depth. Objective: To analyze and compare the characteristics of accuracy (precision and veracity) of intraoral digital impressions. Materials and methods: A bibliograph...
Na minha lista:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Outros Autores: | |
| Formato: | article |
| Idioma: | spa |
| Publicado em: |
2021
|
| Assuntos: | |
| Acesso em linha: | https://revistadigital.uce.edu.ec/index.php/odontologia/article/view/3446 |
| Tags: |
Adicionar Tag
Sem tags, seja o primeiro a adicionar uma tag!
|
Adicionar Tag | _version_ | 1858472099878797312 |
|---|---|
| author | Carrillo Vaca, David Gerardo |
| author2 | Astudillo Ortiz, Jaime Leonardo |
| author2_role | author |
| author_facet | Carrillo Vaca, David Gerardo Astudillo Ortiz, Jaime Leonardo |
| author_role | author |
| collection | Revista Odontología |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv | Carrillo Vaca, David Gerardo Astudillo Ortiz, Jaime Leonardo |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv | 2021-07-30 |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv | application/pdf |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv | https://revistadigital.uce.edu.ec/index.php/odontologia/article/view/3446 10.29166/odontologia.vol23.n2.2021-e3446 |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv | spa |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv | Universidad Central del Ecuador |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv | https://revistadigital.uce.edu.ec/index.php/odontologia/article/view/3446/4206 |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv | Derechos de autor 2021 David Gerardo Carrillo Vaca, Jaime Leonardo Astudillo Ortiz https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv | Odontología; Vol. 23 Núm. 2 (2021): Julio - Diciembre; e3446 1390-9967 10.29166/odontologia.vol23.n2.2021 reponame:Revista Odontología instname:Universidad Central del Ecuador instacron:UCE |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv | Exactitud de los datos precisión de medición dimensional veracidad impresión digital intraoral escáneres intraorales Data Accuracy Dimensional Measurement Accuracy Trueness Intraoral Digital Impression Intraoral Scanner |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv | Accuracy of intraoral impressions: a literature review Precisión de las impresiones digitales intraorales: una revisión de literatura |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv | info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| description | Intraoral fingerprints can vary in precision and accuracy, depending on the scanner used. These parameters have not been studied in depth. Objective: To analyze and compare the characteristics of accuracy (precision and veracity) of intraoral digital impressions. Materials and methods: A bibliographic search was carried out in Pubmed and Cochcrane to identify relevant studies on accuracy in intraoral digital impressions by means of image superposition, and standard models for unitary fixed prostheses or short arches, the characteristics of the studies were delimited by the PICOS system , recommended by the PRISMA guide. Results: 3 selected studies met all previously established eligibility criteria. The scanners analyzed and their precision and accuracy results in the 3 studies were: Bluecam: 12.7 ± 2.6 um / 17.5 ± 1.8 um, Omnicam: 12.5 ± 3.7 um / 13.8 ± 1.4 um. Carestream 3500: 0.014mm / 13 ± 1, Zfx Intrascan: 0.033mm / 30 ± 10-45, Bluecam: 0.029mm / 22.5 ± 25-30, Omnicam: 0.031mm / 30 ± 32.5-27.5, True definition: 0.011mm / 10 ± 2.5-7.5. E4D dentist: 97.6 ± 109.2 um / 114.2 ± 80.7 um, Fastscan: 26.0 ± 24.4 um / 45.2 ± 29.8 um, iTero: 25.8 ± 22.5 um / 52.1 ± 38.8 um, Trios: 13.0 ± 12.1 / 49.7 ± 36.6 um, Zfx Intrascan : 132.3 ± 124.4 um / 89.4 ± 64.2 um. Conclusions: The selected studies found different values of precision and veracity according to the type of scanner, the ones with the best performance were: In precision: Bluecam, Trios, Carestream 3500. While in veracity they were: True Definition, Omnicam, Fastscan. |
| eu_rights_str_mv | openAccess |
| format | article |
| id | REVODONTO_b0166e2a96faac1cbbdcde976bb45faf |
| identifier_str_mv | 10.29166/odontologia.vol23.n2.2021-e3446 |
| instacron_str | UCE |
| institution | UCE |
| instname_str | Universidad Central del Ecuador |
| language | spa |
| network_acronym_str | REVODONTO |
| network_name_str | Revista Odontología |
| oai_identifier_str | oai:revistadigital.uce.edu.ec:article/3446 |
| publishDate | 2021 |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv | Universidad Central del Ecuador |
| reponame_str | Revista Odontología |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv | * |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv | Revista Odontología - Universidad Central del Ecuador |
| repository_id_str | 0 |
| rights_invalid_str_mv | Derechos de autor 2021 David Gerardo Carrillo Vaca, Jaime Leonardo Astudillo Ortiz https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 |
| spelling | Accuracy of intraoral impressions: a literature reviewPrecisión de las impresiones digitales intraorales: una revisión de literaturaCarrillo Vaca, David GerardoAstudillo Ortiz, Jaime LeonardoExactitud de los datosprecisión de medición dimensionalveracidadimpresión digital intraoralescáneres intraoralesData AccuracyDimensional Measurement AccuracyTruenessIntraoral Digital ImpressionIntraoral ScannerIntraoral fingerprints can vary in precision and accuracy, depending on the scanner used. These parameters have not been studied in depth. Objective: To analyze and compare the characteristics of accuracy (precision and veracity) of intraoral digital impressions. Materials and methods: A bibliographic search was carried out in Pubmed and Cochcrane to identify relevant studies on accuracy in intraoral digital impressions by means of image superposition, and standard models for unitary fixed prostheses or short arches, the characteristics of the studies were delimited by the PICOS system , recommended by the PRISMA guide. Results: 3 selected studies met all previously established eligibility criteria. The scanners analyzed and their precision and accuracy results in the 3 studies were: Bluecam: 12.7 ± 2.6 um / 17.5 ± 1.8 um, Omnicam: 12.5 ± 3.7 um / 13.8 ± 1.4 um. Carestream 3500: 0.014mm / 13 ± 1, Zfx Intrascan: 0.033mm / 30 ± 10-45, Bluecam: 0.029mm / 22.5 ± 25-30, Omnicam: 0.031mm / 30 ± 32.5-27.5, True definition: 0.011mm / 10 ± 2.5-7.5. E4D dentist: 97.6 ± 109.2 um / 114.2 ± 80.7 um, Fastscan: 26.0 ± 24.4 um / 45.2 ± 29.8 um, iTero: 25.8 ± 22.5 um / 52.1 ± 38.8 um, Trios: 13.0 ± 12.1 / 49.7 ± 36.6 um, Zfx Intrascan : 132.3 ± 124.4 um / 89.4 ± 64.2 um. Conclusions: The selected studies found different values of precision and veracity according to the type of scanner, the ones with the best performance were: In precision: Bluecam, Trios, Carestream 3500. While in veracity they were: True Definition, Omnicam, Fastscan.Las impresiones digitales intraorales pueden variar en precisión y veracidad, dependiendo del escáner utilizado. Estos parámetros no han sido estudiados a profundidad. Objetivo: Analizar y comparar las características de exactitud (precisión y veracidad) de las impresiones digitales intraorales. Materiales y métodos: Se realizó la búsqueda bibliográfica en Pubmed y Cochcrane para identificar estudios relevantes sobre exactitud en impresiones digitales intraorales mediante superposición de imágenes, y modelos patrón para prótesis fija unitaria o arcos cortos, las características de los estudios fueron delimitadas por el sistema PICOS, recomendado por la guía PRISMA. Resultados: 3 estudios seleccionados cumplieron con todos los criterios de elegibilidad previamente establecidos. Los escáneres analizados y sus resultados de precisión y veracidad en los 3 estudios fueron: Bluecam: 12.7±2.6 um / 17.5±1.8 um, Omnicam: 12.5±3.7 um / 13.8±1.4 um. Carestream 3500: 0.014 mm / 13±1, Zfx Intrascan: 0.033 mm / 30±10-45, Bluecam: 0.029 mm / 22.5±25-30, Omnicam: 0.031 mm / 30±32.5-27.5, True definition: 0.011 mm / 10±2.5-7.5. E4D dentist: 97.6±109.2 um / 114.2±80.7 um, Fastscan: 26.0±24.4 um / 45.2±29.8 um, iTero: 25.8±22.5 um / 52.1±38.8 um, Trios: 13.0±12.1 / 49.7±36.6 um, Zfx Intrascan: 132.3±124.4 um / 89.4±64.2 um. Conclusiones: Los estudios seleccionados encontraron diferentes valores de precisión y veracidad según el tipo de escáner, los de mejor rendimiento fueron: En precisión: Bluecam, Trios, Carestream 3500. Mientras que en veracidad fueron: True Definition, Omnicam, Fastscan.Universidad Central del Ecuador2021-07-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistadigital.uce.edu.ec/index.php/odontologia/article/view/344610.29166/odontologia.vol23.n2.2021-e3446Odontología; Vol. 23 Núm. 2 (2021): Julio - Diciembre; e34461390-996710.29166/odontologia.vol23.n2.2021reponame:Revista Odontologíainstname:Universidad Central del Ecuadorinstacron:UCEspahttps://revistadigital.uce.edu.ec/index.php/odontologia/article/view/3446/4206Derechos de autor 2021 David Gerardo Carrillo Vaca, Jaime Leonardo Astudillo Ortizhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-11-17T03:55:49Zoai:revistadigital.uce.edu.ec:article/3446Portal de revistashttps://revistadigital.uce.edu.ec/Universidad públicahttps://uce.edu.ec/**Ecuador*1390-99671390-7468opendoar:02021-11-17T03:55:49Revista Odontología - Universidad Central del Ecuadorfalse |
| spellingShingle | Accuracy of intraoral impressions: a literature review Carrillo Vaca, David Gerardo Exactitud de los datos precisión de medición dimensional veracidad impresión digital intraoral escáneres intraorales Data Accuracy Dimensional Measurement Accuracy Trueness Intraoral Digital Impression Intraoral Scanner |
| status_str | publishedVersion |
| title | Accuracy of intraoral impressions: a literature review |
| title_full | Accuracy of intraoral impressions: a literature review |
| title_fullStr | Accuracy of intraoral impressions: a literature review |
| title_full_unstemmed | Accuracy of intraoral impressions: a literature review |
| title_short | Accuracy of intraoral impressions: a literature review |
| title_sort | Accuracy of intraoral impressions: a literature review |
| topic | Exactitud de los datos precisión de medición dimensional veracidad impresión digital intraoral escáneres intraorales Data Accuracy Dimensional Measurement Accuracy Trueness Intraoral Digital Impression Intraoral Scanner |
| url | https://revistadigital.uce.edu.ec/index.php/odontologia/article/view/3446 |