Disclosure as a Mechanism to prevent Market Failure

Regulators often address the potential for onesided standard form contracts by requiring extra disclosure of the terms. Despite its ubiquity, for a disclosure regime to be effective, it must increase readership of contracts beyond a nontrivial rate, and, in addition, individuals must be willing to c...

Volledige beschrijving

Bewaard in:
Bibliografische gegevens
Hoofdauteur: Marotta-Wurgler, Florencia (author)
Formaat: article
Taal:spa
Gepubliceerd in: 2017
Onderwerpen:
Online toegang:http://www.revistarfjpuce.edu.ec/index.php/rfj/article/view/31
Tags: Voeg label toe
Geen labels, Wees de eerste die dit record labelt!
_version_ 1859116377264095232
author Marotta-Wurgler, Florencia
author_facet Marotta-Wurgler, Florencia
author_role author
collection Revista Facultad de Jurisprudencia
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Marotta-Wurgler, Florencia
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-12-05
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://www.revistarfjpuce.edu.ec/index.php/rfj/article/view/31
10.26807/rfj.v1i2.31
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador - PUCE: Centro de Publicaciones y Dirección de Investigación
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://www.revistarfjpuce.edu.ec/index.php/rfj/article/view/31/25
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Facultad de Jurisprudencia; Vol. 1 No. 2 (2017): No. 2: Revue Faculté de Jurisprudence
Revista Facultad de Jurisprudencia; V. 1 N. 2 (2017): No. 2: Revista Facoltà di Giurisprudenza
Revista Facultad de Jurisprudencia ; v. 1 n. 2 (2017): No. 2: Revista Faculdade de Jurisprudência
Revista de la Facultad de Jurisprudencia.; Vol. 1 Núm. 2 (2017): Núm. 2: Revista Facultad de Jurisprudencia
Revista de la Facultad de Jurisprudencia.; Vol. 1 No. 2 (2017): No. 2: Journal Faculty of Jurisprudence
2588-0837
10.26807/rfj.v1i2
reponame:Revista Facultad de Jurisprudencia
instname:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador
instacron:PUCE
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv market failures
information disclosure
market
technological products
fallas del mercado
divulgación de información
mercado
productos tecnológicos
consumidores
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Disclosure as a Mechanism to prevent Market Failure
Divulgación como mecanismo para prevenir la falta de mercado
Divulgação como mecanismo para prevenir la falta de mercado
Divulgazione come meccanismo per prevenire il fallimento del mercato
Divulgação como mecanismo para prevenir falhas de mercado
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
description Regulators often address the potential for onesided standard form contracts by requiring extra disclosure of the terms. Despite its ubiquity, for a disclosure regime to be effective, it must increase readership of contracts beyond a nontrivial rate, and, in addition, individuals must be willing to change their decisions conditional on what they read. I follow the clickstream of 47,399 households to 81 Internet software retailers to test whether those who shop for software online are more likely to read the license agreement when it is more prominently disclosed. I find that the degree of disclosure has almost no impact on the rate at which consumers read license agreements. Moreover, those who do read are equally likely to purchase the software product regardless of the onesidedness of the contract. The results suggest that mandating disclosure online is unlikely, on its own, to put pressure on sellers. KEYWORDS: market failures, information disclosure, market, technological products, consumers. JEL CODE: E65, D46
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
format article
id REVRFJ_63ee656e70e0536d2e671e253c885cd9
identifier_str_mv 10.26807/rfj.v1i2.31
instacron_str PUCE
institution PUCE
instname_str Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador
language spa
network_acronym_str REVRFJ
network_name_str Revista Facultad de Jurisprudencia
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/31
publishDate 2017
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador - PUCE: Centro de Publicaciones y Dirección de Investigación
reponame_str Revista Facultad de Jurisprudencia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Facultad de Jurisprudencia - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador
repository_id_str 0
spelling Disclosure as a Mechanism to prevent Market FailureDivulgación como mecanismo para prevenir la falta de mercadoDivulgação como mecanismo para prevenir la falta de mercadoDivulgazione come meccanismo per prevenire il fallimento del mercatoDivulgação como mecanismo para prevenir falhas de mercadoMarotta-Wurgler, Florenciamarket failuresinformation disclosuremarkettechnological productsfallas del mercadodivulgación de informaciónmercadoproductos tecnológicosconsumidoresRegulators often address the potential for onesided standard form contracts by requiring extra disclosure of the terms. Despite its ubiquity, for a disclosure regime to be effective, it must increase readership of contracts beyond a nontrivial rate, and, in addition, individuals must be willing to change their decisions conditional on what they read. I follow the clickstream of 47,399 households to 81 Internet software retailers to test whether those who shop for software online are more likely to read the license agreement when it is more prominently disclosed. I find that the degree of disclosure has almost no impact on the rate at which consumers read license agreements. Moreover, those who do read are equally likely to purchase the software product regardless of the onesidedness of the contract. The results suggest that mandating disclosure online is unlikely, on its own, to put pressure on sellers. KEYWORDS: market failures, information disclosure, market, technological products, consumers. JEL CODE: E65, D46RESUMENLos reguladores a menudo abordan el potencial de los contratos de formulario estándar unilateral requiriendo una divulgación adicional de los términos. A pesar de su ubicuidad, para que un régimen de divulgación sea efectivo, debe aumentar el número de lectores de los contratos más allá de una tasa no trivial, y, además, las personas deben estar dispuestas a cambiar sus decisiones condicionadas a lo que leen. Sigo el flujo de clics de 47,399 hogares a 81 minoristas de software de Internet para probar si quienes compran software en línea son más propensos a leer el acuerdo de licencia cuando se divulga de manera más destacada. Encuentro que el grado de divulgación casi no tiene impacto en la tasa a la que los consumidores leen los acuerdos de licencia. Además, aquellos que sí lo hacen tienen la misma probabilidad de comprar el producto de software, independientemente de la parcialidad del contrato. Los resultados sugieren que exigir la divulgación en línea es poco probable, por sí solo, para presionar a los vendedores. ABSTRACTRegulators often address the potential for onesided standard form contracts by requiring extra disclosure of the terms. Despite its ubiquity, for a disclosure regime to be effective, it must increase readership of contracts beyond a nontrivial rate, and, in addition, individuals must be willing to change their decisions conditional on what they read. I follow the clickstream of 47,399 households to 81 Internet software retailers to test whether those who shop for software online are more likely to read the license agreement when it is more prominently disclosed. I find that the degree of disclosure has almost no impact on the rate at which consumers read license agreements. Moreover, those who do read are equally likely to purchase the software product regardless of the onesidedness of the contract. The results suggest that mandating disclosure online is unlikely, on its own, to put pressure on sellers. KEYWORDS: market failures, information disclosure, market, technological products, consumers. JEL CODE / CLASIFICACIÓN JEL: E65, D46Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador - PUCE: Centro de Publicaciones y Dirección de Investigación2017-12-05info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://www.revistarfjpuce.edu.ec/index.php/rfj/article/view/3110.26807/rfj.v1i2.31Revista Facultad de Jurisprudencia; Vol. 1 No. 2 (2017): No. 2: Revue Faculté de JurisprudenceRevista Facultad de Jurisprudencia; V. 1 N. 2 (2017): No. 2: Revista Facoltà di GiurisprudenzaRevista Facultad de Jurisprudencia ; v. 1 n. 2 (2017): No. 2: Revista Faculdade de Jurisprudência Revista de la Facultad de Jurisprudencia.; Vol. 1 Núm. 2 (2017): Núm. 2: Revista Facultad de Jurisprudencia Revista de la Facultad de Jurisprudencia.; Vol. 1 No. 2 (2017): No. 2: Journal Faculty of Jurisprudence2588-083710.26807/rfj.v1i2reponame:Revista Facultad de Jurisprudenciainstname:Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuadorinstacron:PUCEspahttp://www.revistarfjpuce.edu.ec/index.php/rfj/article/view/31/25info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-11-05T23:55:07Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/31Portal de revistashttp://www.revistarfjpuce.edu.ec/index.php/rfjInstitución privadawww.puce.edu.ecEcuador2588-08372588-0837opendoar:02026-03-08T17:38:00.208866Revista Facultad de Jurisprudencia - Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuadortrue
spellingShingle Disclosure as a Mechanism to prevent Market Failure
Marotta-Wurgler, Florencia
market failures
information disclosure
market
technological products
fallas del mercado
divulgación de información
mercado
productos tecnológicos
consumidores
status_str publishedVersion
title Disclosure as a Mechanism to prevent Market Failure
title_full Disclosure as a Mechanism to prevent Market Failure
title_fullStr Disclosure as a Mechanism to prevent Market Failure
title_full_unstemmed Disclosure as a Mechanism to prevent Market Failure
title_short Disclosure as a Mechanism to prevent Market Failure
title_sort Disclosure as a Mechanism to prevent Market Failure
topic market failures
information disclosure
market
technological products
fallas del mercado
divulgación de información
mercado
productos tecnológicos
consumidores
url http://www.revistarfjpuce.edu.ec/index.php/rfj/article/view/31