Securitization as Survival, Securitization as a Speech Act: A Critic to the Copenhagen School
The present paper addresses how the theoretical framework of the securitisation theory, conceived by the Copenhagen School, embraces unique features of the traditional security studies. Its central focus is the assessment of the conceptions of security as survival embedded in the logic of the speech...
Saved in:
| 主要作者: | |
|---|---|
| 格式: | article |
| 語言: | spa |
| 出版: |
2018
|
| 主題: | |
| 在線閱讀: | https://revistas.flacsoandes.edu.ec/urvio/article/view/3157 |
| 標簽: |
添加標簽
沒有標簽, 成為第一個標記此記錄!
|
添加標簽 | 總結: | The present paper addresses how the theoretical framework of the securitisation theory, conceived by the Copenhagen School, embraces unique features of the traditional security studies. Its central focus is the assessment of the conceptions of security as survival embedded in the logic of the speech act theory, and the characterisation of the role endows to the securitising agents and the audience. By analysing those, this work criticises the methodology proposed by the Copenhagen School that restrains the deepening of the referent object and the broadening of the security agenda. |
|---|