Living Lab as an approach to island rejuvenation through co-creation and Local Ecological Knowledge inclusion in the context of the Aegean Islet Conservation Program: the islet of Anthropofas as a case study

The Aegean Islet Conservation Program is a research project focused on creating a protocol for islet restoration and solutions to land degradation in the Mediterranean, developed by the Archipelagos Institute of Marine Conservation and the John H. Daniels Faculty of Architecture, Landscape, and Desi...

সম্পূর্ণ বিবরণ

সংরক্ষণ করুন:
গ্রন্থ-পঞ্জীর বিবরন
প্রধান লেখক: Bragagnolo Carlon, Lorenzo (author)
বিন্যাস: masterThesis
ভাষা:eng
প্রকাশিত: 2024
বিষয়গুলি:
অনলাইন ব্যবহার করুন:http://hdl.handle.net/10644/10923
ট্যাগগুলো: ট্যাগ যুক্ত করুন
কোনো ট্যাগ নেই, প্রথমজন হিসাবে ট্যাগ করুন!
বিবরন
সংক্ষিপ্ত:The Aegean Islet Conservation Program is a research project focused on creating a protocol for islet restoration and solutions to land degradation in the Mediterranean, developed by the Archipelagos Institute of Marine Conservation and the John H. Daniels Faculty of Architecture, Landscape, and Design of the University of Toronto. Its first case study is constituted by the islet of Anthropofas, part of the Fournoi-Korseon archipelago. Within this initiative, this investigation develops a framework to integrate Local Ecological Knowledge (LEK) to scientific expertise, with the intention of enhancing collaboration and sense of ownership among different stakeholders throughout the entire project life cycle. The main proposition is to deploy a Living Lab user-centred approach to amplify collaboration among different actors and promote co-creation of both knowledge and solutions to existing challenges in the context of Anthropofas. Given the operational nature of this work, after the methodological core of this paper is explained, this is then applied to the program itself. As Participatory Methods are seen as a means to translate Living Lab theory into practice, current research being developed under the Aegean Islet Conservation Program is combined with a series of such tools, categorized according to the four main phases that constitute the development of Living Lab. This is followed by a reflection concerning the concrete potential for a co-creative process to unfold within the program, based on the way the project has been articulated so far by its proponents. The contribution concludes by discussing what limitations could affect the feasibility of the Living Lab-based framework for LEK inclusion and co-creation throughout the project, while also pointing out where future research pertinent to the program ought to head.