La “terminación” del contrato por causas intrínsecas y extrínsecas ¿Un régimen unitario o diferenciado de efectos? (Tema Central)
This paper addresses the question of the reasonableness of a unitary system of effects for contractual termination in a broad sense, encompassing both intrinsic and extrinsic causes. To this end, it undertakes a comparative analysis of the regulation of the effects of nullity and termination for bre...
Uloženo v:
| Hlavní autor: | |
|---|---|
| Další autoři: | |
| Médium: | article |
| Jazyk: | spa |
| Vydáno: |
2025
|
| Témata: | |
| On-line přístup: | http://hdl.handle.net/10644/10579 |
| Tagy: |
Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
|
Přidat tag | Shrnutí: | This paper addresses the question of the reasonableness of a unitary system of effects for contractual termination in a broad sense, encompassing both intrinsic and extrinsic causes. To this end, it undertakes a comparative analysis of the regulation of the effects of nullity and termination for breach in two normative models: one “traditional”, the Civil Code of Bello, and the other “modern”, the UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts. The conclusion suggests that maintaining a differentiated regime, as both texts do, is appropriate. Consequently, doctrinally supporting such a broad notion of “contractual termination” proves neither useful as a basis for a conceptual framework nor as a foundation for a normative regime. |
|---|