El privado como autor de peculado: ¿debate cerrado por la Corte Constitucional? (Tema Central)
Sentence 1364-17-EP/23 of Constitutional Court and article 233 of the CRE regarding embezzlement seems to be closed. It is stated that both public servants and the ones who do not hold this condition can be authors regardless of their conduct. The resolution is not acceptable as it did not confront...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | Charry Dávalos, José Andrés (author) |
|---|---|
| Format: | article |
| Language: | spa |
| Published: |
2024
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10644/9982 |
| Tags: |
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
The Private Person as Perpetrator of Embezzlement: Debate closed by the Constitutional Court?
by: Charry Davalos, Jose Andrés
Published: (2024) -
Teoría de la infracción del deber en el delito de peculado: caso Dhruv
by: Troya Moya, Mishel Macarena
Published: (2023) -
Análisis de los indicios de responsabilidad penal de los delitos de peculado
by: Arellano Salinas, Francia Nathaly
Published: (2021) -
Peculado en los Bancos Privados
by: Llerena Maldonado, Víctor
Published: (2012) -
El delito de peculado bancario y su interpretación jurídica en la Corte Nacional del Ecuador
by: Mora Solórzano, Cristhian Eduardo
Published: (2019)