Tratamiento diferenciado de los organismos de integración representativa del Sector Real en la Ley Orgánica de Economía Popular y Solidaria
This research deals with the historical background of the cooperative in Ecuador, to the implementation of the current economic model of development, which has taken into account the Popular Solidarity Economy to recognize the human being as subject and end. The institutional framework that regulate...
Enregistré dans:
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | bachelorThesis |
| Langue: | spa |
| Publié: |
2015
|
| Sujets: | |
| Accès en ligne: | http://dspace.udla.edu.ec/handle/33000/4507 |
| Tags: |
Ajouter un tag
Pas de tags, Soyez le premier à ajouter un tag!
|
Ajouter un tag | Résumé: | This research deals with the historical background of the cooperative in Ecuador, to the implementation of the current economic model of development, which has taken into account the Popular Solidarity Economy to recognize the human being as subject and end. The institutional framework that regulates the Popular Solidarity Economy in Ecuador and its actors, these are located Integration Representative Organizations, analyze them through this concept, structure and purpose and understand why the statement of the problem is addressed, which is related to the differential treatment it must provide the state regulatory body that oversees; concludes these agencies Representative Integration activities the law entitles them have the character of political union. The problem arises at the time when the Superintendence of Popular Economy and Solidarity controls both organizations of popular and solidarity economy individually and to the integration organizations that group them, this performing a double check. It should be noted that the objective of integration Representative Agency is to safeguard and ensure the welfare of its members, defending their interests against possible irregularities or abuses by public and private institutions, whether these authorities or similar organizations. Because of this dual control, you could create a conflict of interest and possible violations of the rights of the organizations and the state agency responsible for its stewardship acts as judge and jury. |
|---|