La discriminación positiva y la acción afirmativa como mecanismos de igualdad de oportunidades en el acceso al ámbito laboral del sector público ecuatoriano: una mirada a partir de 2008
Affirmative action policies have been configured as an inclusive and necessary policy within the agendas of governments seeking to build a solid democracy as well as an environment of equality and without any trace of discrimination. The most vulnerable groups and victims of historical discriminatio...
-д хадгалсан:
| Үндсэн зохиолч: | |
|---|---|
| Формат: | bachelorThesis |
| Хэл сонгох: | spa |
| Хэвлэсэн: |
2017
|
| Нөхцлүүд: | |
| Онлайн хандалт: | http://dspace.udla.edu.ec/handle/33000/6949 |
| Шошгууд: |
Шошго нэмэх
Шошго байхгүй, Энэхүү баримтыг шошголох эхний хүн болох!
|
Шошго нэмэх | Тойм: | Affirmative action policies have been configured as an inclusive and necessary policy within the agendas of governments seeking to build a solid democracy as well as an environment of equality and without any trace of discrimination. The most vulnerable groups and victims of historical discrimination are the axis of these measures that seek to repair and counteract the exclusion of them both nationally and internationally. The application of affirmative action arises from the 30s, in Ecuador, this policy appears in 1997 with the Labor Quota Law to guarantee gender parity in terms of political representation, and this placed the country as the pioneer in the region with the intention to integrate women in an environment of equal conditions. Similarly, since the return to democracy in 1979, indigenous groups also consolidate a strong struggle to reconfigure the Ecuadorian state that now takes on the plurinational and multiethnic character. During the period of government of Rafael Correa, the Merit and Opposition Contests are promoted, arises the Plurinational Plan to eliminate Racial Discrimination and Ethnic and Cultural Exclusion; and the Organic Law of Public Service; in order to establish coordination, implementation and enforcement of affirmative actions aimed at vulnerable groups and priority attention groups to guarantee their access and representation in the public work environment. The contests have achieved the task but the way of implementing these actions has brought with it a high public opinion that reduces the credibility of the new authorities and questions the true value of identity and the value of equal opportunities that is contemplated in national and international regulations. |
|---|