Estudio del Plan Nacional para el Buen Vivir como instrumento para el ejercicio de los derechos colectivos de pueblos y nacionalidades indígenas en Ecuador desde el 2008 al 2013
The Plan Nacional de Desarrollo, also known as the National Plan for Buen Vivir 2009 –2013, constitutes an important and central instrument for the current Ecuadorian government, and articulates public policies in relation to political process an public funding in the country. A leading question whe...
Bewaard in:
| Hoofdauteur: | |
|---|---|
| Formaat: | bachelorThesis |
| Taal: | spa |
| Gepubliceerd in: |
2017
|
| Onderwerpen: | |
| Online toegang: | http://dspace.udla.edu.ec/handle/33000/8353 |
| Tags: |
Voeg label toe
Geen labels, Wees de eerste die dit record labelt!
|
Voeg label toe | Samenvatting: | The Plan Nacional de Desarrollo, also known as the National Plan for Buen Vivir 2009 –2013, constitutes an important and central instrument for the current Ecuadorian government, and articulates public policies in relation to political process an public funding in the country. A leading question whether the Plan Nacional for Buen Vivir is really capable of contributing to the plurinationalism of different indigenous nationalities in Ecuador during the given time frame. In order to so, an analysis of the policies stipulated in the plan that aim at guaranteeing of Plurinational State, follows accordingly. During the investigation various levels pf political and discursive influence - stemming from the Plan Nacional para el Buen Vivir. –are identified, and the impact they have on realizing Plurinational State, policies that allow participation in government issues are analyzed, as well as influence and impact indigenous populations have on the political structures in Ecuador – i.e. social mobility and political management, other analyzed elements include the evolution of publics policies under the incumbert refime with regard to the Plan Nacional for Buen Vivir. As a result this analysis, it has been found the no large or significant participation from indigenous nationalitines has emerged from the government policies during the period of 2009-2013. Additionally, more than seven years have passed since named the state Plurinational and intercultural and yet the rights of peoples and communities from indigenous nationalities have not been sufficiently protected or otherwise recognized |
|---|