La indemnización de daños inmateriales como mecanismo de reparación integral en delitos de violencia física intrafamiliar en Ecuador.
The present investigation examines criteria for the quantification of intangible damage to victims of crimes of domestic physical violence in order to establish the correspondence with the damage caused. For this purpose, it is defined mechanisms of integral reparation provided in the Integral Crimi...
Kaydedildi:
| Yazar: | |
|---|---|
| Materyal Türü: | masterThesis |
| Dil: | spa |
| Baskı/Yayın Bilgisi: |
2022
|
| Konular: | |
| Online Erişim: | https://dspace.ueb.edu.ec/handle/123456789/4620 |
| Etiketler: |
Etiketle
Etiket eklenmemiş, İlk siz ekleyin!
|
Etiketle | Özet: | The present investigation examines criteria for the quantification of intangible damage to victims of crimes of domestic physical violence in order to establish the correspondence with the damage caused. For this purpose, it is defined mechanisms of integral reparation provided in the Integral Criminal Organic Code, determining advantages and disadvantages of the current mechanism of reparation of compensation for intangible damages in crimes of domestic physical violence in Ecuador. The methodology used has a qualitative approach to the development of interviews with jurisdictional officials of the canton Ambato, from which legal criteria have been collected that allow to assess the pragmatic sense of the current reality around the topic investigated. The work is presented in chapters, beginning with Chapter I which contains the approach to the problem, based on the general objective and the specific objectives of the research, to then address in Chapter II of the Theoretical Framework in which the background of the research and doctrinal development of the present study is highlighted taking into consideration several authors who determine that women in the vast majority are the ones who suffer the most from domestic violence. Chapter III address the methodology used in which there is no statistical representation, and finally there is Chapter IV focused in the results of the research that logically serves as an illustration to direct and indirect beneficiaries. It is concluded that there are not specific criteria for determining the quantification of intangible damages to victims of crimes of domestic physical violence, as well as that the current mechanism for reparation of compensation of intangible damage in crimes of domestic physical violence does not guarantee immediate reparation. |
|---|