Citación a través de medios de comunicación y su antinomia jurídica con la ley orgánica de transparencia y acceso a la información pública, vulnera el principio de celeridad
The purpose of this investigation is to perform an interpretative analysis of the legal provision established in Article 56 Inc. 2 of the General Organic Code of Processes, regarding the burden imposed on the plaintiff of a judicial proceeding to access public access records for the purpose to obtai...
Saved in:
| 主要作者: | |
|---|---|
| 格式: | bachelorThesis |
| 語言: | spa |
| 出版: |
2018
|
| 主題: | |
| 在線閱讀: | http://repositorio.ulvr.edu.ec/handle/44000/2467 |
| 標簽: |
添加標簽
沒有標簽, 成為第一個標記此記錄!
|
添加標簽 | 總結: | The purpose of this investigation is to perform an interpretative analysis of the legal provision established in Article 56 Inc. 2 of the General Organic Code of Processes, regarding the burden imposed on the plaintiff of a judicial proceeding to access public access records for the purpose to obtain a domicile address and the protection of personal data determined in the Organic Law of Transparency and Access to Public Information, which prevents the delivery of this information because it is considered a private personal nature and can only be requested by the owner and is missing of this the judge, provisions that being contrary generate a legal antinomy that in turn leads to violation of rights and constitutional principles, such as speed, efficiency, legal security, effective judicial protection due process. By the analysis made in doctrinal and jurisprudential aspect, review of causes plus the results obtained in the surveys and interviews, is evident and coincide with the need to reform the art. 56 inc 2 of the COGEP and in relation to it the 142 numeral 4 of the same rule on the requirement of the demand, to maintain coherence in the legal order and in turn the elimination of normative contradiction….. |
|---|