Estudio comparativo del hábeas corpus en la constitución de 1998 y la constitución del 2008
This research has the objective of determining the effectiveness of its design as jurisdictional guarantee. A legal, doctrinaire and critical habeas corpus study has been carried out, of which habeas corpus is a right of citizens who, faced with an illegal, arbitrary or illegitimate detention, allow...
Saved in:
| 主要作者: | |
|---|---|
| 格式: | bachelorThesis |
| 語言: | spa |
| 出版: |
2018
|
| 主題: | |
| 在線閱讀: | http://dspace.unach.edu.ec/handle/51000/4597 |
| 標簽: |
添加標簽
沒有標簽, 成為第一個標記此記錄!
|
添加標簽 | 總結: | This research has the objective of determining the effectiveness of its design as jurisdictional guarantee. A legal, doctrinaire and critical habeas corpus study has been carried out, of which habeas corpus is a right of citizens who, faced with an illegal, arbitrary or illegitimate detention, allows them to appear before their natural judge and competent to be heard, in order to resolve whether or not to continue in detention. The habeas corpus is composed of several elements such as: The scope of protection, active and passive legitimization, form of filing and resolution, competent authority, among others. The aforementioned components of the habeas corpus, between the Political Constitution of 1998 and the Constitution of the Republic of 2008, have been contrasted through comparative tables, obtaining as a final product the similarities and differences in the design of the habeas corpus in the two constitutions. Once the differences and similarities of the habeas corpus were discernible, surveys were applied to the selected population, with these answers; the conclusions and recommendations that were found at the end of the present investigation were reached. |
|---|