El uso de las Pruebas Indiciarias en las Sentencias Condenatorias
The proof is known in doctrine as probative law, in this way the evidence has created a great conflict within the criteria of law writers, because some determine it as a sign of little probative value, because it is not direct evidence or true, while other writers manifest the great probative value...
Wedi'i Gadw mewn:
| Prif Awdur: | |
|---|---|
| Fformat: | bachelorThesis |
| Iaith: | spa |
| Cyhoeddwyd: |
2019
|
| Pynciau: | |
| Mynediad Ar-lein: | http://dspace.unach.edu.ec/handle/51000/5646 |
| Tagiau: |
Ychwanegu Tag
Dim Tagiau, Byddwch y cyntaf i dagio'r cofnod hwn!
|
Ychwanegu Tag | Crynodeb: | The proof is known in doctrine as probative law, in this way the evidence has created a great conflict within the criteria of law writers, because some determine it as a sign of little probative value, because it is not direct evidence or true, while other writers manifest the great probative value they have since if there is no direct evidence that can give certainty of the commission of the crime, the evidence collected by the prosecutor's office can be used and those prosecuted in the corresponding hearing will be considered evidence, always taking into account an adequate judicial reasoning by the judge. The study of the circumstantial evidence has special relevance, since in our Ecuadorian criminal system, this type of test is purely doctrinaire, so the Organic Comprehensive Penal Code in its article 498 states the different means of proof such as: The document , the testimony and expertise, on which the operators of justice, must distinguish which is considered as direct or indirect evidence, through their sound criticism, their reasoning and the techniques they apply when using the circumstantial evidence. |
|---|