Estudio comparativo del procedimiento administrativo sancionador, ejecutado por la Agencia Nacional de Regulación Control y Vigilancia Sanitaria (ARCSA), en contraposición con lo determinado en el Código Orgánico Administrativo (COA).
The investigation is carried out in the interest of determining the conflict between norms that have led to the possible violation of constitutional and legal principles and rights within the constitutional and legal principles and rights within the context of the administrative sanctioning where, d...
保存先:
| 第一著者: | |
|---|---|
| フォーマット: | masterThesis |
| 言語: | spa |
| 出版事項: |
2024
|
| 主題: | |
| オンライン･アクセス: | http://dspace.unach.edu.ec/handle/51000/13843 |
| タグ: |
タグ追加
タグなし, このレコードへの初めてのタグを付けませんか!
|
タグ追加 | 要約: | The investigation is carried out in the interest of determining the conflict between norms that have led to the possible violation of constitutional and legal principles and rights within the constitutional and legal principles and rights within the context of the administrative sanctioning where, due to the lack of a correct and uniform application of norms, it has been necessary to analyze the analysis of precepts that contribute to and correspond to due process has been necessary, to due process. By virtue of this, the objectives aimed at finding a likely solution to this problem were to find a probable solution to this problem. For this purpose, the following were reviewed and certain specific articles, as well as a survey, were reviewed as part of the methodology that would of the methodology to help determine, among other conclusions, the need to harmonize the legal texts the need to harmonize the legal texts such as the Organic Administrative Code, the Organic Law of Public Health of Public Health and the procedure and the procedure carried out by the National Agency of Regulation, Control and Sanitary Surveillance to avoid resolutions that do not obey that do not obey and leave aside the right to defense of the administered as well as the principle of presumption of innocence. The principle of presumption of innocence in the absence of timely notification so that the sanctioning the sanctioned party to be able to put himself at law and argue what is necessary. It is recommended that the Zonal Coordination 3 of ARCSA guarantees the respect for the principles in function that the administered parties have access to the information by means of the correct notification to avoid information through the correct notification to avoid irreparable damage after the execution of a sanction. after the execution of a sanction. |
|---|