Comparación de la metodología BIM vs la tradicional en las fases de planificación y diseño. Caso de estudio: Infraestructura Educativa de la Coordinación Zonal 1 de Educación.
The adoption of collaborative methods in the construction industry continues to increase. This is especially relevant to building information modeling (BIM), which has been implemented in many countries due to the improvements observed in the projects where it is applied. With the increasing adoptio...
Guardado en:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | masterThesis |
| Lenguaje: | spa |
| Publicado: |
2024
|
| Materias: | |
| Acceso en línea: | http://dspace.unach.edu.ec/handle/51000/14015 |
| Etiquetas: |
Agregar Etiqueta
Sin Etiquetas, Sea el primero en etiquetar este registro!
|
Agregar Etiqueta | Sumario: | The adoption of collaborative methods in the construction industry continues to increase. This is especially relevant to building information modeling (BIM), which has been implemented in many countries due to the improvements observed in the projects where it is applied. With the increasing adoption of collaborative methods in the construction industry, the objective of this research gains significant relevance. The aim is to compare the BIM methodology with the traditional one in the planning and design phases of a case study. This comparison will help determine the main differences in work volumes, execution times, and budgets, providing valuable insights for project management. For this non-experimental research with a descriptive-correlational and mixed approach, we collected information from a practical project. The project, “Construction of school classrooms in the educational units Teodoro Gómez and 28 de September, District 10D01 Ibarra Pimampiro San Miguel de Urcuquí - Education, Canton Ibarra, belonging to the Zonal Coordination 1 - Education”, includes 57 items. We then developed the project using the BIM methodology, carrying out the work programming, calculating quantities, and estimating the budget for later comparisons. The research findings are particularly significant for the public sector. Sixty-five percent of the budget items showed variations according to the BIM methodology calculation, and the deadline was reduced by 27 calendar days compared to the traditional methodology schedule. Likewise, the budget was reduced by 12% due to changes in the calculated quantities of work. These results demonstrate the advantages of applying the BIM methodology in public sector projects, which can lead to more appropriate investment in infrastructure. |
|---|