La valoración del exámen psicológico y su incidencia en sentencias de violencia psicológica contra la mujer o miembros del núcleo familiar dictadas por el Tribunal de la Unidad Penal con sede en el cantón Riobamba, durante el periodo agosto 2014-agosto 2015.

The purpose of this study is determine what extent the psychological examination the victim represents full proof and likewise in this way is the main piece of evidence in the trial hearing for the judge issued conviction or acquittal . While the psychological test that is performed by an expert duly accredited represents a key piece of evidence for the judge when to issue his decision, it remains true that this test must be based being so be determined to what extent the testimony of the victim turns out to be true so that the judge and the trial hearing has to arrive at the total conviction that the report of the expert psychologist as his testimony meets the relevant legal formalities so that it can issue a fully accurate and fair sentence . The assessment of psychological test is a really complex issue because the person involved must be an expert professional in the field so that through the various mechanisms that I used to evaluate the victim this issue a reasoned report and attached to the reality of the facts and the reality of the damage that may have been the victim , this report should be as real and as transparent as it should have in mind that this fosters a judgment that has to be in accordance with law and respecting all constitutional precepts they should be taken into account by the members of the Judicial Criminal Court based in Riobamba Canton . Also it must be emphasized that under Article 157 of the Ecuadorian Comprehensive Organic Code of Criminal Procedure establishes three types of psychological harm them corresponding to a mild, moderate and severe turn damage they have a respective sanction that may be imposed by the judge according to extent of injury whereas psychological violence causes harm on mental health for acts of disturbance, threats, manipulation, blackmail, humiliation, isolation, surveillance, harassment or control beliefs, decisions and actions, and if so the judge impose a penalty for being guilty of infringement mented. Finally it should be noted that within the audience must exhaust all evidence of both discharge and charge being so processing is also in its right to defend itself as well as rebut what the prosecution raised in the audience.

• Yazar: Berrones Valdiviezo, Jairo Ivan (author)
• Materyal Türü: bachelorThesis
• Dil: spa
• Baskı/Yayın Bilgisi: 2016
• Konular: Exámen psicológico; Violencia psicológica
• Online Erişim: http://dspace.unach.edu.ec/handle/51000/1594