Comparación entre mta y biodentine para el sellado de perforación de furca, revisión bibliográfica

Furcation perforation is a significant complication in endodontics that may be due to iatrogenesis, periodontal pathologies or severe caries. The materials most commonly used for its repair are Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA) and Biodentine, which are based on Tricalcium Silicate but have demonstrated several differences in their effectiveness in this type of endodontic diagnosis. Objective: To determine the effectiveness of two biomaterials: MTA and BD; applied to seal furcation perforations. Materials and methods: A documentary analysis of scientific articles published from 2019 onwards was carried out, following the PRISMA methodology in scientific information platforms of scientific importance such as: PubMed, LILCAS, Scielo, and Google Scholar. Results: 225 articles were identified and subjected to a screening process based on PRIMA parameters and inclusion and exclusion criteria, obtaining 14 studies that were included in the exhaustive review. Conclusion: Both MTA and Biodentine are effective for furcation perforation repair, but Biodentine is the biomaterial that demonstrated the greatest efficacy in terms of seal, compressive strength, push-fit resistance, marginal adaptation and solubility. The biocompatibility (tissue and inflammatory response) and bioactivity (bone resorption and cement repair) of the two materials was equally effective and no statistically significant differences were found between the two biomaterials.

• Autor principal: Garzón Aguirre, Aylin Katina (author)
• Formato: bachelorThesis
• Idioma: spa
• Publicado em: 2025
• Assuntos: DEFECTOS DE FURCACIÓN; MATERIALES BIOCOMPATIBLES; ENDODONCIA; EFECTIVIDAD
• Acesso em linha: https://dspace.uniandes.edu.ec/handle/123456789/18983