Estudio comparativo in vitro del grado de microfiltración de dos materiales provisionales en molares y premolares permanentes
Oral health professionals often resort to various types of provisional materials as a temporary option in their treatments, but there are clinical manifestations that demonstrate the lack of airtight seal resulting in marginal filtration which leads to contamination of the dental structure. Objectiv...
Uloženo v:
| Hlavní autor: | |
|---|---|
| Médium: | bachelorThesis |
| Jazyk: | spa |
| Vydáno: |
2019
|
| Témata: | |
| On-line přístup: | http://dspace.unl.edu.ec/jspui/handle/123456789/22582 |
| Tagy: |
Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
|
Přidat tag | Shrnutí: | Oral health professionals often resort to various types of provisional materials as a temporary option in their treatments, but there are clinical manifestations that demonstrate the lack of airtight seal resulting in marginal filtration which leads to contamination of the dental structure. Objective: To compare the degree of microfiltration of two temporary materials in permanent molars and premolars by means of methylene blue staining. Materials and methods: 40 healthy unirradicular and multiradicular teeth were used, divided into a control group of 20 teeth, designated with a C1-20 code and 20 dental pieces for an experimental group identified with the O1-20 code; to be placed in the incubator (Thermo Scientific model HERA THERM IGS60) at 37 ° C temperature for 7 days; after that, these were immersed in methylene blue for 7 days, then cut longitudinally and the degree of microfiltration was evaluated in each of them using a Lee score scale: from 0 to 3 versus the microscope (Single Model Binocular Steromicroscope ZM181HF, 10X magnification eyepieces and 6.7.1) zoom. Results showed that Coltosol F was the temporary restoration material that presented the lowest degree of microfiltration reaching the dentin enamel junction (grade 3) with a percentage of 65%. Concluding that the material of choice in clinical practice, according to the present study, is Coltosol, because it has a lower degree of microfiltration, grade 1, unlike the Obetur with a higher degree of microfiltration, grade 2, and even achieving results. With grade 3. Key words: marginal micro filtration, temporary sealing materials. |
|---|