Reformas al artículo 580 del Código Del Trabajo, para garantizar la igualdad de derechos y principios básicos de oportunidad, defensa, tutela efectiva, efectividad probatoria de la parte demandada en el juicio oral
The work is a fundamental right of an economic nature, and it is set as social and familial duty, source of personal and economic embodiment, it applies under predetermined, such as full content, intangibility, stability principles, including full effect. Following a conflict arises between employer...
Uloženo v:
| Hlavní autor: | |
|---|---|
| Médium: | bachelorThesis |
| Jazyk: | spa |
| Vydáno: |
2015
|
| Témata: | |
| On-line přístup: | http://dspace.unl.edu.ec/jspui/handle/123456789/8678 |
| Tagy: |
Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
|
Přidat tag | Shrnutí: | The work is a fundamental right of an economic nature, and it is set as social and familial duty, source of personal and economic embodiment, it applies under predetermined, such as full content, intangibility, stability principles, including full effect. Following a conflict arises between employers and workers or vice versa, it is the ordinary courts, by judges Labour, the aforementioned conflict will be resolved on the basis of the system of evidence which the parties put forward in court, for the full and sole conviction of the judge, who issued his authority with sufficient judicial verdict. The trial, presented as procedural environment in labor cases, expedited process, as stipulated in the Labour Code, precisely to resolve problems that arise in this area of law, which supports elements of the administration, say justice, serves to facilitate the proper management in labor red tape. A vacuum that was required research, since both constitutional and legal principles, are affected by the mere fact of a guarantor makes not been established when the defense of the person who happens to be the defendant was observed in the process when unable to attend the preliminary hearing, is not the ability to generate evidence in court, and failing that, will be the proceedings against him, by the mere fact of not having announced diligence test and consequently as referred to above have motivated and expeditious rights principles such as legal security, social justice, evidence principle of immediacy, concentration and legality, among others are violated. Favorable response was determined when the literary study, as performed empirically or field, gave a positive result, generate reforms that permit fair to the tenor of the above listed principles and for such consideration trial, it was found to be in a reform that can promote these principles |
|---|