Incongruencia jurídica presentada en el código orgánico integral penal en el articulo 587 numeral 1 y la constitución de la república del ecuador articulo 168 numeral 6
The possibility that an oral hearing be the judge their own criteria of procedural reality is formed, by the bond of relationship with the accused and the litigants, their senses to perceive the behavior of each of them, you allows to abstract from third party comments only show the result of what h...
Saved in:
| 主要作者: | |
|---|---|
| 格式: | bachelorThesis |
| 语言: | spa |
| 出版: |
2015
|
| 主题: | |
| 在线阅读: | http://dspace.unl.edu.ec/jspui/handle/123456789/13164 |
| 标签: |
添加标签
没有标签, 成为第一个标记此记录!
|
添加标签 | 总结: | The possibility that an oral hearing be the judge their own criteria of procedural reality is formed, by the bond of relationship with the accused and the litigants, their senses to perceive the behavior of each of them, you allows to abstract from third party comments only show the result of what has been made aware or disposal. Orality is spoken or orally, helps agility and speed of the procedure, in our legal system has given priority to the principle of orality in criminal proceedings. However despite this principle enshrined in Article 168 Number 6 in which states that the conduct of processes in all subjects, bodies, steps and proceedings will be conducted by the oral system, this is not true in today Comprehensive Organic Penal Code as Article 587 which states that for archiving cause hearing is not required. Thereby violating a constitucional principle |
|---|