El rol de los jueces y juezas ecuatorianos en el constitucionalismo contemporáneo

This investigative report provides an analysis of the doctrine addressing contemporary constitutionalism paradigms, namely: a Social State of rights, constitutional supremacy, and direct protection of fundamental rights. Employing the dogmatic, analytical-synthetic, and comparative methods, it establishes Ecuador's adherence to this constitutional jurisprudential trend. Consequently, it identifies inevitable shifts or behaviors within the Judicial Function, as the competent State authority per the Constitution and Law, responsible for ensuring the efficacy of human rights when judicially invoked due to non-observance or infringement. Hence, the imperative to constitutionalize the administration of justice through the actions of judges becomes apparent, functioning as upholders of constitutional supremacy and executors of International Conventions and Treaties, guided by the pro homine principle. Correspondingly, there exists a requirement for judicial operatives to fulfill their adjudicating role by applying an expansive hermeneutic approach, transcending literalism and engendering a cognitive process founded on constitutional principles and applicable interpretive methodologies tailored to each case. Moreover, the proficient employment of conventionality control is indispensable, given Ecuador's subscription to the American Convention on Human Rights and its ratification of the contentious and advisory jurisdiction of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights.

• Главный автор: Maldonado Castro, Talía Margarita (author)
• Формат: bachelorThesis
• Язык: spa
• Опубликовано: 2023
• Предметы: DERECHO CONSTITUCIONAL; DERECHO; CONSTITUCIONALISMO CONTEMPORANEO; SIPREMACIA CONTITUCIONAL
• Online-ссылка: https://dspace.unl.edu.ec/jspui/handle/123456789/27745