Análisis Jurisprudencial y constitucional del fallo de triple reiteración sobre los efectos jurídicos de la vigencia de los contratos colectivos, emitido por el Pleno de la Corte Nacional de Justicia de fecha 8 de julio de 2009.
Although the Constitution of the Republic of Ecuador guarantees the labor and union rights of workers, giving them the category of inalienable and intangible, in case of doubt the Indubio pro-worker principle will be applied. However, the Plenary Session of the National Court of Justice of Ecuador h...
محفوظ في:
| المؤلف الرئيسي: | |
|---|---|
| التنسيق: | masterThesis |
| اللغة: | spa |
| منشور في: |
2024
|
| الموضوعات: | |
| الوصول للمادة أونلاين: | https://dspace.unl.edu.ec/jspui/handle/123456789/28919 |
| الوسوم: |
إضافة وسم
لا توجد وسوم, كن أول من يضع وسما على هذه التسجيلة!
|
إضافة وسم | الملخص: | Although the Constitution of the Republic of Ecuador guarantees the labor and union rights of workers, giving them the category of inalienable and intangible, in case of doubt the Indubio pro-worker principle will be applied. However, the Plenary Session of the National Court of Justice of Ecuador has issued the triple reiteration ruling dated July 8, 2009, published in official record 650 of August 6, 2009, which prescribes that the term of The duration of a collective contract determines the validity of its legal effects without it being considered that a contract of this nature can be understood as of indefinite duration, which violates the inalienable and intangible rights of workers, as well as the rights of progressivity and non- regression. In this research, the emergence of unionism in the international context, as well as in Ecuador, was analyzed. The collective contract and its classifications, the constitutional guarantee of union rights, the supremacy of the constitutional norm were reviewed; the role of the International Labor Organization. An analysis was carried out on the background of the triple reiteration ruling issued by the Plenary Session of the National Court of Justice, to conclude on the legal, economic, social and family effects that this Triple reiteration ruling has produced on unionized workers. To achieve this, the scientific, analytical, exegetical, hermeneutic and synthetic method has been used, using theoretical documentary collection techniques, documentary observation techniques, and surveys. |
|---|