Medidas cautelares e inhabilidades para el alimentante, en el derecho de alimentos, establecidos en el título v de la ley orgánica reformatoria del código de la niñez y la adolescencia

The current Constitution recognizes and guarantees a number of rights to individuals, such as the right to privacy; freedom; personal integrity; the right to choose to be chosen; and the right to work. Today I can see that these rights are violated , as in Title V of the Law Amending the Code of Childhood and Adolescence, I can see that when the obligor has defaulted on two or more child support , the judge Family , Children and Adolescents at the request of the party concerned and obviously because it’s the law, enacted a series of injunctions and prohibitions against forced between them can cite the following : Personal urgency and incorporation in the register debtor , the list is sent to the Superintendence of Banks and Insurance, for incorporation into the Registration System debtors; prohibition to leave the country; prohibition to dispose of property; prohibition of any candidate dignity; prohibition to exercise public office; and also empowers impose any injunction provided for in the Code of Civil Procedure. As can be seen these measures are too extreme, because in most cases are enacted all of them together, leaving the required total impossibility of tell yourself as a credit to cover the maintenance obligation or hold public office and bring result in greater benefits for the recipient, because her alimony would improve significantly and obviously could cover such payments. My question perhaps it is how the apremiarle the solution must exist and be able to pay this obligation. Perhaps deprived of his liberty may generate economic resources? Or simply you are creating a total picture of resentment or revenge between parents and children? I think these laws to regulate the application of these precautionary measures, allowing the obligor 's ability to access bank loans to enable it to fulfill the obligation, or performing a public work provisions careful analysis, especially when the quantities for delivery food are enormous and in many cases the native cunning are used by people who have custody of the child , who receive federal financial aid , by the respondent , but unfortunately this not justify paying by invoice , because no has been performed in any institution or bank that can justify a means , take advantage of this situation , requesting settlement in reality become unpayable.

• Autor principal: Cumbicos Aguilar, Roberto Carlos (author)
• Format: bachelorThesis
• Idioma: spa
• Publicat: 2014
• Accés en línia: http://dspace.unl.edu.ec/jspui/handle/123456789/14995