Reforma al art.187 del Código Orgánico Integral Penal, en cuanto al abuso de confianza

The core budget of the offence of breach of trust, is the provision which makes the active subject for himself or for another, of a movable thing outside, same which transmitted to it holding and not the domain to the detriment of the liability. Now, the scope of the word transmission implies a tran...

Бүрэн тодорхойлолт

-д хадгалсан:
Номзүйн дэлгэрэнгүй
Үндсэн зохиолч: Granda Valdivieso, Diana Carolina (author)
Формат: bachelorThesis
Хэл сонгох:spa
Хэвлэсэн: 2015
Нөхцлүүд:
Онлайн хандалт:http://dspace.unl.edu.ec/jspui/handle/123456789/8879
Шошгууд: Шошго нэмэх
Шошго байхгүй, Энэхүү баримтыг шошголох эхний хүн болох!
_version_ 1857832992260489216
author Granda Valdivieso, Diana Carolina
author_facet Granda Valdivieso, Diana Carolina
author_role author
collection Repositorio Universidad Nacional de Loja
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Costa Cevallos, Marcelo Armando
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Granda Valdivieso, Diana Carolina
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-12-01T19:12:16Z
2015-12-01T19:12:16Z
2015
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 121 p.
application/pdf
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://dspace.unl.edu.ec/jspui/handle/123456789/8879
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Loja
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ec/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositorio Universidad Nacional de Loja
instname:Universidad Nacional de Loja
instacron:UNL
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv CÓDIGO ORGÁNICO INTEGRAL PENAL
EL DELITO
REFORMA AL ART. 187
ABUSO DE CONFIANZA
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Reforma al art.187 del Código Orgánico Integral Penal, en cuanto al abuso de confianza
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
info:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis
description The core budget of the offence of breach of trust, is the provision which makes the active subject for himself or for another, of a movable thing outside, same which transmitted to it holding and not the domain to the detriment of the liability. Now, the scope of the word transmission implies a transfer of rights, which means that transmission holding concerning the crime of abuse of trust as budget it is, the thing is transferred material and physically under any title allowed by law. The Constitution of the Republic in its paragraph Art.66 22 mentions the right to property, determining the following: "26. The right to the property in all its forms, with function and social and environmental responsibility. The right of access to the property will be effective with the adoption of public policies, among other measures." This constitutional treatment of property does not entail a simple point of order, but it can be deduced the doctrine that presents the Constitution with regard to this right. Indeed, the Constitution conceives of the property as a "civil right", from the level of the individual, and is a means to achieve the full development of the moral and material of the person. Meanwhile, the Art.187 establishes: that; "The person who has for itself or a third, of money, goods or assets delivered with the condition of restoring them or use them in a particular way, shall be punished with imprisonment of one to three years. The same penalty is imposed on the person who, abusing another, signed in blank document, extend it any document to the detriment of the signer or a third." In law, the abuse of trust is an offence where the offender abused the trust placed by the victim. One of the most common abuses of trust is the misappropriation of assets, taking advantage of that victim grants you the use or possession of said well. The legal problem lies in the second paragraph of this article, since in contrast to the first paragraph, is determined the abuse of signature on a document on a person in favor of another third target, since they are different acts and they should not be punished in the same way, since this latest act has and brings more serious repercussions, which fall within the rights of property of the victim or abused Hence the urgent need to carry out a study and research on the present issue, in order to determine the legal reform immediately to the Art.187 of the organic comprehensive Penal Code regarding the abuse of trust
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
format bachelorThesis
id UNL_686f2a94dc027d7a87d46ab18e25edf4
instacron_str UNL
institution UNL
instname_str Universidad Nacional de Loja
language spa
network_acronym_str UNL
network_name_str Repositorio Universidad Nacional de Loja
oai_identifier_str oai:dspace.unl.edu.ec:123456789/8879
publishDate 2015
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Loja
reponame_str Repositorio Universidad Nacional de Loja
repository.mail.fl_str_mv *
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio Universidad Nacional de Loja - Universidad Nacional de Loja
repository_id_str 0
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ec/
spelling Reforma al art.187 del Código Orgánico Integral Penal, en cuanto al abuso de confianzaGranda Valdivieso, Diana CarolinaCÓDIGO ORGÁNICO INTEGRAL PENALEL DELITOREFORMA AL ART. 187ABUSO DE CONFIANZAThe core budget of the offence of breach of trust, is the provision which makes the active subject for himself or for another, of a movable thing outside, same which transmitted to it holding and not the domain to the detriment of the liability. Now, the scope of the word transmission implies a transfer of rights, which means that transmission holding concerning the crime of abuse of trust as budget it is, the thing is transferred material and physically under any title allowed by law. The Constitution of the Republic in its paragraph Art.66 22 mentions the right to property, determining the following: "26. The right to the property in all its forms, with function and social and environmental responsibility. The right of access to the property will be effective with the adoption of public policies, among other measures." This constitutional treatment of property does not entail a simple point of order, but it can be deduced the doctrine that presents the Constitution with regard to this right. Indeed, the Constitution conceives of the property as a "civil right", from the level of the individual, and is a means to achieve the full development of the moral and material of the person. Meanwhile, the Art.187 establishes: that; "The person who has for itself or a third, of money, goods or assets delivered with the condition of restoring them or use them in a particular way, shall be punished with imprisonment of one to three years. The same penalty is imposed on the person who, abusing another, signed in blank document, extend it any document to the detriment of the signer or a third." In law, the abuse of trust is an offence where the offender abused the trust placed by the victim. One of the most common abuses of trust is the misappropriation of assets, taking advantage of that victim grants you the use or possession of said well. The legal problem lies in the second paragraph of this article, since in contrast to the first paragraph, is determined the abuse of signature on a document on a person in favor of another third target, since they are different acts and they should not be punished in the same way, since this latest act has and brings more serious repercussions, which fall within the rights of property of the victim or abused Hence the urgent need to carry out a study and research on the present issue, in order to determine the legal reform immediately to the Art.187 of the organic comprehensive Penal Code regarding the abuse of trustEl presupuesto básico del delito abuso de confianza, consiste en la disposición que hace el sujeto activo para sí o para otro, de una cosa mueble ajena, misma de la que se le ha transmitido la tenencia y no el dominio en perjuicio del pasivo. Ahora bien, el alcance del vocablo transmisión, implica una transferencia de derechos, lo que quiere decir que la transmisión de la tenencia a que se refiere el ilícito de abuso de confianza como presupuesto lo es, que la cosa se traslade material y físicamente bajo cualquier título permitido por la Ley. Nuestra Constitución de la Republica en su Art.66 numeral 22 menciona el derecho a la propiedad, determinando lo siguiente: “26. El derecho a la propiedad en todas sus formas, con función y responsabilidad social y ambiental. El derecho al acceso a la propiedad se hará efectivo con la adopción de políticas públicas, entre otras medidas.” Este tratamiento constitucional de la propiedad no comporta una simple cuestión de orden, sino que de él puede deducirse la doctrina que presenta la Constitución de la República respecto de este derecho. En efecto, la Constitución de la República concibe a la propiedad como un "derecho civil", desde el plano del individuo, y en cuanto es un medio para lograr el pleno desenvolvimiento moral y material de la persona. Mientras, que el Art.187 establece: que; “La persona que disponga, para sí o una tercera, de dinero, bienes o activos patrimoniales entregados con la condición de restituirlos o usarlos de un modo determinado, será sancionada con pena privativa de libertad de uno a tres años. La misma pena se impone a la persona que, abusando de la firma de otra, en documento en blanco, extienda con ella algún documento en perjuicio de la firmante o de una tercera.” En Derecho, el abuso de confianza es un delito en el que el delincuente abusa de la confianza depositada por la víctima. Uno de los abusos de confianza más comunes es la apropiación indebida de bienes, aprovechando que la víctima le concede el uso o la tenencia de dicho bien. La problemática jurídica radica en el segundo párrafo de este artículo, puesto a diferencia del primer párrafo, se determina el abuso de firma en un documento en blanco de una persona a favor de otra tercera, ya que son distintos actos y no deberían ser sancionados de la misma forma, ya que este último acto tiene y trae repercusiones más graves, que recaen en los derechos de propiedad de la víctima o abusado. De ahí la imperiosa necesidad de realizar un estudio e investigación sobre la presente problemática, con el fin de determinar la reforma legal inmediata al Art.187 del Código Orgánico Integral Penal en cuanto al abuso de confianzaLojaCosta Cevallos, Marcelo Armando2015-12-01T19:12:16Z2015-12-01T19:12:16Z2015info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis121 p.application/pdfhttp://dspace.unl.edu.ec/jspui/handle/123456789/8879spahttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ec/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositorio Universidad Nacional de Lojainstname:Universidad Nacional de Lojainstacron:UNL2025-05-02T14:27:23Zoai:dspace.unl.edu.ec:123456789/8879Institucionalhttps://dspace.unl.edu.ec/Universidad públicahttps://unl.edu.ec/https://dspace.unl.edu.ec/oaiEcuador***opendoar:02025-05-02T14:27:23falseInstitucionalhttps://dspace.unl.edu.ec/Universidad públicahttps://unl.edu.ec/https://dspace.unl.edu.ec/oai*Ecuador***opendoar:02025-05-02T14:27:23Repositorio Universidad Nacional de Loja - Universidad Nacional de Lojafalse
spellingShingle Reforma al art.187 del Código Orgánico Integral Penal, en cuanto al abuso de confianza
Granda Valdivieso, Diana Carolina
CÓDIGO ORGÁNICO INTEGRAL PENAL
EL DELITO
REFORMA AL ART. 187
ABUSO DE CONFIANZA
status_str publishedVersion
title Reforma al art.187 del Código Orgánico Integral Penal, en cuanto al abuso de confianza
title_full Reforma al art.187 del Código Orgánico Integral Penal, en cuanto al abuso de confianza
title_fullStr Reforma al art.187 del Código Orgánico Integral Penal, en cuanto al abuso de confianza
title_full_unstemmed Reforma al art.187 del Código Orgánico Integral Penal, en cuanto al abuso de confianza
title_short Reforma al art.187 del Código Orgánico Integral Penal, en cuanto al abuso de confianza
title_sort Reforma al art.187 del Código Orgánico Integral Penal, en cuanto al abuso de confianza
topic CÓDIGO ORGÁNICO INTEGRAL PENAL
EL DELITO
REFORMA AL ART. 187
ABUSO DE CONFIANZA
url http://dspace.unl.edu.ec/jspui/handle/123456789/8879