Limitaciones a la intervención estatal en la correspondencia personal, en salvedad al derecho a la dignidad e intimidad personal
The Communications between people possess an intimate character itself, regardless of the content of it, depending on their issue, these can be private. So in defense of this personal information it is issued as standard fundamental nature of the right to secrecy of correspondence, considering this...
محفوظ في:
| المؤلف الرئيسي: | |
|---|---|
| التنسيق: | bachelorThesis |
| اللغة: | spa |
| منشور في: |
2017
|
| الموضوعات: | |
| الوصول للمادة أونلاين: | http://dspace.unl.edu.ec/jspui/handle/123456789/18381 |
| الوسوم: |
إضافة وسم
لا توجد وسوم, كن أول من يضع وسما على هذه التسجيلة!
|
إضافة وسم | الملخص: | The Communications between people possess an intimate character itself, regardless of the content of it, depending on their issue, these can be private. So in defense of this personal information it is issued as standard fundamental nature of the right to secrecy of correspondence, considering this private and intimate quality to possess information that the issuer does not want it to be public, putting her knowledge only of the person who is oriented correspondence. It is dignity a right that every person possesses and which would be affected to know such information private and intimate nature, since dignity is widely linked to honor, and therefore some actions that, while not illegal, may become contrary to morality, so that whoever issues the correspondence prefers to keep secret. Thus the state, by intervening communications under the prestablece the Code of Integral Penal, in all cases, creates an environment of legal uncertainty, to counteract a standard of superior order and the constitution, therefore it becomes necessary establish limitations on this power to intervene communications to certain crimes that indeed establish a real need, generating a benefit for society and the State structure |
|---|