Articaína al 4% vs lidocaína al 2% para la extracción de terceros molares mandibulares. Una revisión bibliográfica
Articaine and lidocaine are defined as local chemicals that specifically, temporarily, and reversibly block nerve conduction, they are usually used especially in dentistry for surgical and pain treatments, making their use involved in most third molar extractions. A bibliographic review was carried...
Wedi'i Gadw mewn:
| Prif Awdur: | |
|---|---|
| Fformat: | bachelorThesis |
| Iaith: | spa |
| Cyhoeddwyd: |
2022
|
| Pynciau: | |
| Mynediad Ar-lein: | https://dspace.unl.edu.ec/jspui/handle/123456789/25743 |
| Tagiau: |
Ychwanegu Tag
Dim Tagiau, Byddwch y cyntaf i dagio'r cofnod hwn!
|
Ychwanegu Tag | Crynodeb: | Articaine and lidocaine are defined as local chemicals that specifically, temporarily, and reversibly block nerve conduction, they are usually used especially in dentistry for surgical and pain treatments, making their use involved in most third molar extractions. A bibliographic review was carried out with the objective of determining which of these two is the best local anesthetic for the extraction of mandibular third molars when comparing their characteristics, for this the bibliographic databases were used: PubMed, RRAAE, Google Scholar, Dialnet, JDAPM, Researchgate, Int. J. Odontostomat, medLine, Jaypee, LILACS, Cochrane, BVS, and institutional repositories of universities with articles published from 2012 to 2022. After considering 60 articles with inclusion and exclusion criteria, a sample of 28 articles from which the characteristics of lidocaine and articaine were extracted in concentrations of epinephrine 1:80,000, 1:100,000 and 1:200,000 for the first, and 1:100,000 and 1:200,000 for the second; using an Excel table, all of these were averaged and the latency in seconds, pain during and after the surgical procedure with a visual analog scale (VAS) from 0 to 10, the total time of the anesthetic effect in minutes, the dose used in ml and the percentage of patients who required reanesthesia between both anesthetics were compared. After comparing them, we conclude that 4% articaine proved to be more effective for the extraction of mandibular third molars than 2% lidocaine in its different concentrations, except for 4% articaine with epinephrine 1:100,000 vs. 2% lidocaine with epinephrine 1:100000 where lidocaine is slightly above articaine due to its remarkably shorter latency |
|---|