“Valoración de la aplicación de los precedentes jurisprudenciales vinculantes de la Corte Constitucional a favor del trabajador sustituto para garantizar la estabilidad reforzada”
People with disabilities make up one of the priority attention groups in Ecuadorian society, to whom the State recognizes preferential and specialized protection so that they can make their fundamental rights effective. In the Ecuadorian constitutional and labor regime, the right of these people to...
Spremljeno u:
| Glavni autor: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | masterThesis |
| Jezik: | spa |
| Izdano: |
2024
|
| Teme: | |
| Online pristup: | https://dspace.unl.edu.ec/jspui/handle/123456789/28841 |
| Oznake: |
Dodaj oznaku
Bez oznaka, Budi prvi tko označuje ovaj zapis!
|
Dodaj oznaku | Sažetak: | People with disabilities make up one of the priority attention groups in Ecuadorian society, to whom the State recognizes preferential and specialized protection so that they can make their fundamental rights effective. In the Ecuadorian constitutional and labor regime, the right of these people to work is enshrined, which must be exercised in an appropriate environment and under conditions that guarantee the dignity of the worker with disabilities. Special protection has been established in favor of workers with disabilities, under the name of the right to reinforced stability, which guarantees that these people or those in charge of their care and protection cannot be discriminated against due to the limitation. who suffer and even less dismissed untimely, a budget in which a special liquidation will take place. In this work, the case of reinforced stability of substitute workers for people with disabilities is especially analyzed, since it has been determined that when resolving protection actions raised by citizens who are in this condition, judges do not observe the jurisprudential precedents dictated by the Constitutional Court of Ecuador, producing a violation of fundamental rights that should preferably and especially be protected by the administrators of justice. Therefore, the study addresses the problem described, based on the analysis of doctrinal and jurisprudential criteria, and moves towards the formulation of conclusions and suggestions that contribute to addressing the evident problem. |
|---|