Reforma del artículo 56 de la Ley Orgánica de Comunicación para garantizar la efectiva tutela de los derechos de información y comunicación en el Ecuador
The constitutional State of rights and justice, in accordance with principles and norms of the American Convention on Human Rights recognizes the rights to communication, comprising: freedom of expression, information and equal access to radio spectrum and technology information and communication Ar...
Sparad:
| Huvudupphovsman: | |
|---|---|
| Materialtyp: | bachelorThesis |
| Språk: | spa |
| Publicerad: |
2015
|
| Ämnen: | |
| Länkar: | http://dspace.unl.edu.ec/jspui/handle/123456789/8445 |
| Taggar: |
Lägg till en tagg
Inga taggar, Lägg till första taggen!
|
Lägg till en tagg | Sammanfattning: | The constitutional State of rights and justice, in accordance with principles and norms of the American Convention on Human Rights recognizes the rights to communication, comprising: freedom of expression, information and equal access to radio spectrum and technology information and communication Article 384 of the Constitution of the Republic establishes that the system of social communication must ensure the exercise of the rights to communication, information and freedom of expression and strengthening citizen participation; Once entered into force the Law of communication we have been able to identify in the short time of application of the rule, the existing problems characterized by excesses in the powers of intervention of the Superintendency of Information and Communication according to art. 56 can supervise, monitor and manage compliance with laws and regulations on the rights of communication and in case of failure to apply the penalties provided for under this law, as excessive fines for media mainly private not They align management philosophy and government ideology; this undoubtedly is a humiliation of the fundamental freedom to communicate and inform, excessive powers and discretion of the Superintendent of Information and Communication has become an executive arm of the government communications policy still evident rights, besides having established itself as a sanctioning body, expression of state coercive power |
|---|