Necesidad de incorporar en el código orgánico integral penal, las circunstancias agravantes del delito de sicariato

Within the scope of the Ecuadorian criminal procedural law, the legal concept of contract killings as a crime, which in its concept proposed in the Organic Integral Penal Code provides as follows: "The person who kills another by price, payment, reward, promise, remuneration or other form of be...

Celý popis

Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
Hlavní autor: Cabrera Ramón, Ismael Patricio (author)
Médium: bachelorThesis
Jazyk:spa
Vydáno: 2017
On-line přístup:http://dspace.unl.edu.ec/jspui/handle/123456789/19061
Tagy: Přidat tag
Žádné tagy, Buďte první, kdo vytvoří štítek k tomuto záznamu!
_version_ 1857833012810481664
author Cabrera Ramón, Ismael Patricio
author_facet Cabrera Ramón, Ismael Patricio
author_role author
collection Repositorio Universidad Nacional de Loja
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Vivanco Müller, Igor Eduardo
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Cabrera Ramón, Ismael Patricio
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-06-21T21:24:38Z
2017-06-21T21:24:38Z
2017
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 100 p.
application/pdf
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://dspace.unl.edu.ec/jspui/handle/123456789/19061
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ec/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositorio Universidad Nacional de Loja
instname:Universidad Nacional de Loja
instacron:UNL
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Necesidad de incorporar en el código orgánico integral penal, las circunstancias agravantes del delito de sicariato
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
info:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis
description Within the scope of the Ecuadorian criminal procedural law, the legal concept of contract killings as a crime, which in its concept proposed in the Organic Integral Penal Code provides as follows: "The person who kills another by price, payment, reward, promise, remuneration or other form of benefit, for himself or a third party, shall be punished by deprivation of liberty for a term of 22 to 26 years. The same penalty shall be applicable to the person, which directly or by brokerage, order or order the cometimiento of this illicit trafficking. It is understood that the offense was committed in Ecuadorian territory and jurisdiction when the acts of preparation, organization and planning, are made in Ecuador, even when their implementation is consumed in the territory of another State. The single advertising or offer of contract killings, shall be punished by deprivation of liberty for a term of five to seven years," however there is no feature that in addition to being the payment for the death of a person, causing serious inconsistencies with the provisions raised within the same legal body. (Organic Integral Penal Code, 2014). Art. 143. Among which we have to affect the principle of due process, and even the principle of innocence of the people in this type of crime are being accused, because being accused, the process that will be followed and the aggravating circumstances are not well specified in the aforementioned legal body, causing it to criminalize or confused with another type of crime either the same murder in itself because the same penalty is applied in these two offenses without aggravating circumstances to identify the two as such, or at least special feature in which it can be to criminalize the hired killers. In the same way we have in the case of the murder because in its relevant article mentions "the man who kills another shall be punished by deprivation of liberty for a term of ten to thirteen years", which in this case the only differentiation with the hired killers would be the death penalty and the form of payment key feature of hired killers, but it is not clear, nor a way of among these three items, so as to identify them with clarity or precision. (Organic Integral Penal Code, 2014). Art. 144. With what is given also to the violation of the principles of implementation of the rights according to the provisions of article 11, paragraph 1, of the Constitution of our country, taking into account how particularly in the area of constitutional provisions, as the Ecuadorian State would be admitting his responsibility, by a judicial error or violation of the Agreement as set out in article 11 paragraph 9 paragraph 4, which would be responsible directly if there is an error, if it be the case within the theme of the hired killers. It should be emphasized that the hired killers is a growing phenomenon that has a high degree of violence, which generates a strong social impact and that now it is taking into consideration on the part of our authorities, since it recognized the existence of the hired killers that when you had one of these cases judged as "aggravated homicide", leaving to take into account people who spoke to this crime is carried out, this gave as a result the impunity of war crimes committed. It is important then to say that the characterization of this offense is now taken as a figure dependent like others, that sustains a process as a mechanism, a tool by which this may be punished according to the circumstances not so clear referred to in the present article that typifies this crime and therefore commit error of any kind at the time of the trial, you can resort to take it as another type of crime or worse to follow a process not suitable, for the unequivocal evidence that they are presented or by implication, it would lead to a confusion of crime and responsibility.
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
format bachelorThesis
id UNL_8e3d790b4d1925c1d8ec689205e02c30
instacron_str UNL
institution UNL
instname_str Universidad Nacional de Loja
language spa
network_acronym_str UNL
network_name_str Repositorio Universidad Nacional de Loja
oai_identifier_str oai:dspace.unl.edu.ec:123456789/19061
publishDate 2017
reponame_str Repositorio Universidad Nacional de Loja
repository.mail.fl_str_mv *
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio Universidad Nacional de Loja - Universidad Nacional de Loja
repository_id_str 0
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ec/
spelling Necesidad de incorporar en el código orgánico integral penal, las circunstancias agravantes del delito de sicariatoCabrera Ramón, Ismael PatricioWithin the scope of the Ecuadorian criminal procedural law, the legal concept of contract killings as a crime, which in its concept proposed in the Organic Integral Penal Code provides as follows: "The person who kills another by price, payment, reward, promise, remuneration or other form of benefit, for himself or a third party, shall be punished by deprivation of liberty for a term of 22 to 26 years. The same penalty shall be applicable to the person, which directly or by brokerage, order or order the cometimiento of this illicit trafficking. It is understood that the offense was committed in Ecuadorian territory and jurisdiction when the acts of preparation, organization and planning, are made in Ecuador, even when their implementation is consumed in the territory of another State. The single advertising or offer of contract killings, shall be punished by deprivation of liberty for a term of five to seven years," however there is no feature that in addition to being the payment for the death of a person, causing serious inconsistencies with the provisions raised within the same legal body. (Organic Integral Penal Code, 2014). Art. 143. Among which we have to affect the principle of due process, and even the principle of innocence of the people in this type of crime are being accused, because being accused, the process that will be followed and the aggravating circumstances are not well specified in the aforementioned legal body, causing it to criminalize or confused with another type of crime either the same murder in itself because the same penalty is applied in these two offenses without aggravating circumstances to identify the two as such, or at least special feature in which it can be to criminalize the hired killers. In the same way we have in the case of the murder because in its relevant article mentions "the man who kills another shall be punished by deprivation of liberty for a term of ten to thirteen years", which in this case the only differentiation with the hired killers would be the death penalty and the form of payment key feature of hired killers, but it is not clear, nor a way of among these three items, so as to identify them with clarity or precision. (Organic Integral Penal Code, 2014). Art. 144. With what is given also to the violation of the principles of implementation of the rights according to the provisions of article 11, paragraph 1, of the Constitution of our country, taking into account how particularly in the area of constitutional provisions, as the Ecuadorian State would be admitting his responsibility, by a judicial error or violation of the Agreement as set out in article 11 paragraph 9 paragraph 4, which would be responsible directly if there is an error, if it be the case within the theme of the hired killers. It should be emphasized that the hired killers is a growing phenomenon that has a high degree of violence, which generates a strong social impact and that now it is taking into consideration on the part of our authorities, since it recognized the existence of the hired killers that when you had one of these cases judged as "aggravated homicide", leaving to take into account people who spoke to this crime is carried out, this gave as a result the impunity of war crimes committed. It is important then to say that the characterization of this offense is now taken as a figure dependent like others, that sustains a process as a mechanism, a tool by which this may be punished according to the circumstances not so clear referred to in the present article that typifies this crime and therefore commit error of any kind at the time of the trial, you can resort to take it as another type of crime or worse to follow a process not suitable, for the unequivocal evidence that they are presented or by implication, it would lead to a confusion of crime and responsibility.Dentro de ámbito del derecho procesal penal ecuatoriano, la figura legal del sicariato como un delito, que en su concepto propuesto en el Código Orgánico Integral Penal se dispone como: “La persona que mate a otra por precio, pago, recompensa, promesa remuneratoria u otra forma de beneficio, para sí o un tercero, será sancionada con pena privativa de libertad de veintidós a veintiséis años. La misma pena será aplicable a la persona, que en forma directa o por intermediación, encargue u ordene el cometimiento de este ilícito. Se entenderá que la infracción fue cometida en territorio y jurisdicción ecuatorianos cuando los actos de preparación, organización y planificación, sean realizados en el Ecuador, aun cuando su ejecución se consume en territorio de otro Estado. La sola publicidad u oferta de sicariato será sancionada con pena privativa de libertad de cinco a siete años”, sin embargo no existe ninguna característica que además de ser el pago por la muerte de una persona, provocando serias discordancias con las disposiciones planteadas dentro del mismo cuerpo legal. (Código Orgánico Integral Penal, 2014). Art. 143. Entre las cuales tenemos que afectar el principio del debido proceso e incluso el principio de inocencia de las personas que en este tipo de delito están siendo acusados, puesto que al ser acusados, el proceso que se seguirá y las circunstancias agravantes no se encuentran bien especificadas en el cuerpo legal ya antes mencionada, causando se la pueda llegar a tipificar o confundir con otro tipo de delito ya sea el mismo asesinato en sí pues las misma pena se la aplica en estos dos delitos sin entablar circunstancias agravantes que identifiquen a los dos como tal, o por lo menos característica especiales en la cual se la pueda tipificar como delito del sicariato. De igual manera tenemos en el caso del homicidio pues en su artículo pertinente menciona “la persona que mate a otra será sancionada con pena privativa de libertad de diez a trece años” que en este caso la única diferenciación con el sicariato sería la pena y la forma de pago característica fundamental del sicariato, pero no se esclarece ni se determina una forma de entre estos tres artículos para así identificarlos con claridad o precisión. (Código Orgánico Integral Penal, 2014). Art. 144. Con lo que se da paso también a la violación de los principios de aplicación de los derechos de acuerdo a lo dispuesto en el artículo 11 numeral 1 de la Carta magna de nuestro país, tomando en cuenta como particular en el ámbito constitucional, ya que el Estado ecuatoriano estaría admitiendo su responsabilidad, por un error judicial o por violación de derechos de acuerdo lo establece el su artículo 11 numeral 9 inciso cuarto, en el cual estaría responsabilizándose directamente si existe un error, si fuere el caso se produjere en el tema del sicariato. Cabe recalcar que el sicariato es un fenómeno en crecimiento que tiene un alto grado de violencia, que genera un fuerte impacto social y que ahora se la está tomando muy en cuenta por parte de nuestras autoridades, puesto que reconocieron la existencia del sicariato que cuando se presentaban uno de estos casos lo juzgaban como “homicidio agravado”, dejando de tomar en cuenta a las personas que intervinieron para que este delito se realice, esto daba como consecuencia la impunidad de los crímenes realizados. Es importante entonces decir que la tipificación de este delito es tomado ahora ya como una figura dependiente al igual que las demás, que sustenta un proceso como un mecanismo, una herramienta por la cual este puede sancionar de acuerdo a las circunstancias no tan claras mencionadas en el actual artículo que tipifica este delito y por lo tanto se cometerá error de toda naturaleza en el momento del juzgamiento, puede recurrir a tomarlo como otro tipo de delito o peor aún seguir un proceso no adecuado, por las pruebas inequívocas que fueren presentadas o por presunción se llegaría a una confusión de delito y responsabilidad.Vivanco Müller, Igor Eduardo2017-06-21T21:24:38Z2017-06-21T21:24:38Z2017info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis100 p.application/pdfhttp://dspace.unl.edu.ec/jspui/handle/123456789/19061spahttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ec/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositorio Universidad Nacional de Lojainstname:Universidad Nacional de Lojainstacron:UNL2025-05-02T14:51:16Zoai:dspace.unl.edu.ec:123456789/19061Institucionalhttps://dspace.unl.edu.ec/Universidad públicahttps://unl.edu.ec/https://dspace.unl.edu.ec/oaiEcuador***opendoar:02025-05-02T14:51:16falseInstitucionalhttps://dspace.unl.edu.ec/Universidad públicahttps://unl.edu.ec/https://dspace.unl.edu.ec/oai*Ecuador***opendoar:02025-05-02T14:51:16Repositorio Universidad Nacional de Loja - Universidad Nacional de Lojafalse
spellingShingle Necesidad de incorporar en el código orgánico integral penal, las circunstancias agravantes del delito de sicariato
Cabrera Ramón, Ismael Patricio
status_str publishedVersion
title Necesidad de incorporar en el código orgánico integral penal, las circunstancias agravantes del delito de sicariato
title_full Necesidad de incorporar en el código orgánico integral penal, las circunstancias agravantes del delito de sicariato
title_fullStr Necesidad de incorporar en el código orgánico integral penal, las circunstancias agravantes del delito de sicariato
title_full_unstemmed Necesidad de incorporar en el código orgánico integral penal, las circunstancias agravantes del delito de sicariato
title_short Necesidad de incorporar en el código orgánico integral penal, las circunstancias agravantes del delito de sicariato
title_sort Necesidad de incorporar en el código orgánico integral penal, las circunstancias agravantes del delito de sicariato
url http://dspace.unl.edu.ec/jspui/handle/123456789/19061