Reforma al artículo 5 de la ley para la promoción del trabajo juvenil, regulación excepcional de la jornada de trabajo, cesantía y seguro de desempleo en relación a la licencia sin remuneración para el cuidado de los hijos

Precisely my theme is framed in the treatment and the revision of the labor law and with greater specificity of the organic law for the promotion of the youth work, exceptional regulation of the working day, unemployment and unemployment insurance, body of rules in force since 28 March of the year 2016; the law in question has led to the entry into force of a broad debate and critical at the level of the legal forum, the sector of workers, workers, the private company and the society in general, since it has changed important laws through the incorporation of their regulations, such as the Labor Code, the organic law of social security, the law of internships in the business sector, the law Organic of public service and the law on the bank of the institute of social security. The complexity of labor relations by the difficulty of the economic conditions conducive to a myriad of circumstances which force to generate policy changes and precisely this has been one of the arguments to incorporate reforms to the Labor Code in Ecuador. The organic law for the promotion of the youth work, exceptional regulation of the working day, unemployment and unemployment insurance in force since 28 March 2016, brings with it important changes that warrants study and discuss and on the basis of the social impact that generate, raise some alternatives of normative regulation; the problem is evident by the negative effects that are derived on the collective of workers and workers in the public and private sector, this is to visualize the difficult situation in which it is located to the fathers and mothers who are licensed legally acknowledged by maternity or paternity leave, since the standard today granted a license without salary for nine additional months from The conclusion of the time of license that was already recognized in the law; in the first place we must identify that this additional license for nine months is without remuneration, then input is perceived an inconvenience that results in a legal issue on the grounds that family needs may not be properly covered, since neither the father nor the mother will have income during nine months, resulting contradictory the purpose of protection of the family nucleus that intended by the reform.

• 第一著者: Guillin Zhuma, Carlos Antonio (author)
• フォーマット: bachelorThesis
• 言語: spa
• 出版事項: 2016
• 主題: TÌTULO ABOGADO; REFORMAR ARTÌCULO; PROMOCIÒN TRABAJO JUVENIL; REGULACIÒN JORNADA; CESANTIA SEGURO DESEMPLEO; LICENCIA SIN REMUNERACIÒN
• オンライン･アクセス: http://dspace.unl.edu.ec/jspui/handle/123456789/17625