Endodoncia no instrumentada vs convencional en dentición decidua: Revisión Bibliográfica

The oral health of young children, especially in the primary dentition stage, is significantly challenged by carious lesions that can affect the dental pulp and lead to serious conditions such as irreversible pulpitis and pulp necrosis. In response, the standard treatment is conventional pulpectomy,...

সম্পূর্ণ বিবরণ

সংরক্ষণ করুন:
গ্রন্থ-পঞ্জীর বিবরন
প্রধান লেখক: Bravo Bermeo, Gabriela del Cisne (author)
বিন্যাস: bachelorThesis
ভাষা:spa
প্রকাশিত: 2024
বিষয়গুলি:
অনলাইন ব্যবহার করুন:https://dspace.unl.edu.ec/jspui/handle/123456789/31183
ট্যাগগুলো: ট্যাগ যুক্ত করুন
কোনো ট্যাগ নেই, প্রথমজন হিসাবে ট্যাগ করুন!
_version_ 1857833038597062656
author Bravo Bermeo, Gabriela del Cisne
author_facet Bravo Bermeo, Gabriela del Cisne
author_role author
collection Repositorio Universidad Nacional de Loja
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Valarezo Bravo, Tannya Lucila
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Bravo Bermeo, Gabriela del Cisne
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024-10-29T16:29:29Z
2024-10-29T16:29:29Z
2024-10-28
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 94 páginas
application/pdf
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://dspace.unl.edu.ec/jspui/handle/123456789/31183
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv spa
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Loja
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ec/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositorio Universidad Nacional de Loja
instname:Universidad Nacional de Loja
instacron:UNL
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv ODONTOLOGÍA
PULPECTOMÍA
DENTICIÓN DECIDUA
LESIÓN CARIOSA
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Endodoncia no instrumentada vs convencional en dentición decidua: Revisión Bibliográfica
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
info:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis
description The oral health of young children, especially in the primary dentition stage, is significantly challenged by carious lesions that can affect the dental pulp and lead to serious conditions such as irreversible pulpitis and pulp necrosis. In response, the standard treatment is conventional pulpectomy, which involves the instrumentation and filling of root canals. However, a noninstrumental approach to endodontics, using antibiotic pastes to sterilize and promote tissue repair without mechanical intervention, has gained increasing interest. The objective of this research project is to compare the protocols and effectiveness of non-instrumented endodontics versus conventional methods in pulpectomy of primary dentition. The methodology included a thorough review of the scientific literature, including systematic reviews and case studies, obtained from databases such as PubMed and Google Scholar. Strict inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied to ensure the reliability and quality of the data. When comparing the protocols used in both techniques, they are largely similar. However, the main difference is that conventional endodontics involves instrumentation of the root canals, while the non-instrumental technique relies solely on the application of antibiotic pastes placed at the entrance of each root canal. The results indicate that non-instrumented endodontics is as effective as conventional methods, with success rates of 80% for the resolution of pulpitis in non-instrumented cases and 75% for conventional treatments. The non-instrumented technique offers several advantages, including a significant reduction in invasiveness (90%) and shorter treatment time. As a result, it is considered a valuable and effective alternative to conventional methods, providing similar clinical outcomes with fewer complications and a less invasive approach
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
format bachelorThesis
id UNL_d0764c29ddb5b7d8e6bee8d616fddecd
instacron_str UNL
institution UNL
instname_str Universidad Nacional de Loja
language spa
network_acronym_str UNL
network_name_str Repositorio Universidad Nacional de Loja
oai_identifier_str oai:dspace.unl.edu.ec:123456789/31183
publishDate 2024
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Loja
reponame_str Repositorio Universidad Nacional de Loja
repository.mail.fl_str_mv *
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositorio Universidad Nacional de Loja - Universidad Nacional de Loja
repository_id_str 0
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ec/
spelling Endodoncia no instrumentada vs convencional en dentición decidua: Revisión BibliográficaBravo Bermeo, Gabriela del CisneODONTOLOGÍAPULPECTOMÍADENTICIÓN DECIDUALESIÓN CARIOSAThe oral health of young children, especially in the primary dentition stage, is significantly challenged by carious lesions that can affect the dental pulp and lead to serious conditions such as irreversible pulpitis and pulp necrosis. In response, the standard treatment is conventional pulpectomy, which involves the instrumentation and filling of root canals. However, a noninstrumental approach to endodontics, using antibiotic pastes to sterilize and promote tissue repair without mechanical intervention, has gained increasing interest. The objective of this research project is to compare the protocols and effectiveness of non-instrumented endodontics versus conventional methods in pulpectomy of primary dentition. The methodology included a thorough review of the scientific literature, including systematic reviews and case studies, obtained from databases such as PubMed and Google Scholar. Strict inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied to ensure the reliability and quality of the data. When comparing the protocols used in both techniques, they are largely similar. However, the main difference is that conventional endodontics involves instrumentation of the root canals, while the non-instrumental technique relies solely on the application of antibiotic pastes placed at the entrance of each root canal. The results indicate that non-instrumented endodontics is as effective as conventional methods, with success rates of 80% for the resolution of pulpitis in non-instrumented cases and 75% for conventional treatments. The non-instrumented technique offers several advantages, including a significant reduction in invasiveness (90%) and shorter treatment time. As a result, it is considered a valuable and effective alternative to conventional methods, providing similar clinical outcomes with fewer complications and a less invasive approachLa salud oral infantil, especialmente en la dentición decidua, enfrenta un desafío significativo debido a las lesiones cariosas que pueden comprometer la pulpa dental, llevando a problemas severos como pulpitis irreversible y necrosis pulpar. La pulpectomía convencional, que implica la instrumentación y obturación de los conductos radiculares, es el tratamiento estándar; sin embargo, la endodoncia no instrumentada, que utiliza pastas antibióticas para esterilizar y reparar el tejido sin instrumentar, ha ganado atención. El objetivo de esta investigación es comparar los protocolos y efectividad de la endodoncia no instrumentada frente a la convencional en la pulpectomía de dentición decidua. La metodología consiste en una revisión bibliográfica de artículos científicos, revisiones sistemáticas y análisis de casos obtenidos de bases de datos como PubMed y Google Scholar. Se aplicaron criterios de inclusión y exclusión rigurosos para asegurar la calidad de la información. Al comparar los protocolos que se utilizan en ambas técnicas son similares en su mayor parte, la gran diferencia de ellos es que en la endodoncia convencional se la realiza utilizando instrumentos en los conductos y en la no instrumentada simplemente se utiliza pastas antibióticas que se colocan en la entrada de cada canal de la raíz. En cuanto a su efectividad los resultados revelan que la endodoncia no instrumentada muestra una efectividad comparable a la convencional; con tasas de éxito del 80% en la resolución de pulpitis irreversible y necrosis pulpar y un 75% respectivamente para la técnica convencional. La técnica no instrumentada ofrece ventajas en términos de menor invasividad (90%) y reducción del tiempo de tratamiento, por lo que es una alternativa valiosa y efectiva a la técnica convencional, con resultados clínicos similares, pero con menores complicaciones y un procedimiento menos invasivoLojaValarezo Bravo, Tannya Lucila2024-10-29T16:29:29Z2024-10-29T16:29:29Z2024-10-28info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis94 páginasapplication/pdfhttps://dspace.unl.edu.ec/jspui/handle/123456789/31183spahttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ec/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositorio Universidad Nacional de Lojainstname:Universidad Nacional de Lojainstacron:UNL2025-05-02T15:19:00Zoai:dspace.unl.edu.ec:123456789/31183Institucionalhttps://dspace.unl.edu.ec/Universidad públicahttps://unl.edu.ec/https://dspace.unl.edu.ec/oaiEcuador***opendoar:02025-05-02T15:19falseInstitucionalhttps://dspace.unl.edu.ec/Universidad públicahttps://unl.edu.ec/https://dspace.unl.edu.ec/oai*Ecuador***opendoar:02025-05-02T15:19Repositorio Universidad Nacional de Loja - Universidad Nacional de Lojafalse
spellingShingle Endodoncia no instrumentada vs convencional en dentición decidua: Revisión Bibliográfica
Bravo Bermeo, Gabriela del Cisne
ODONTOLOGÍA
PULPECTOMÍA
DENTICIÓN DECIDUA
LESIÓN CARIOSA
status_str publishedVersion
title Endodoncia no instrumentada vs convencional en dentición decidua: Revisión Bibliográfica
title_full Endodoncia no instrumentada vs convencional en dentición decidua: Revisión Bibliográfica
title_fullStr Endodoncia no instrumentada vs convencional en dentición decidua: Revisión Bibliográfica
title_full_unstemmed Endodoncia no instrumentada vs convencional en dentición decidua: Revisión Bibliográfica
title_short Endodoncia no instrumentada vs convencional en dentición decidua: Revisión Bibliográfica
title_sort Endodoncia no instrumentada vs convencional en dentición decidua: Revisión Bibliográfica
topic ODONTOLOGÍA
PULPECTOMÍA
DENTICIÓN DECIDUA
LESIÓN CARIOSA
url https://dspace.unl.edu.ec/jspui/handle/123456789/31183