Evaluación de dos balanceados comerciales en la fase de crecimiento y engorde de cobayos (Cavia porcellus) en el centro binacional de formación técnica-Zapotepamba
The research was conducted in the canton avocados, Zapotepamba neighborhood, in the area of production of guinea pigs Binational Technical Training Center-Zapotepamba (CBFT-Z) of the National University of Loja. This work aimed to evaluate the production parameters (feed intake, weight gain, feed co...
Saved in:
| 主要作者: | |
|---|---|
| 格式: | bachelorThesis |
| 语言: | spa |
| 出版: |
2015
|
| 主题: | |
| 在线阅读: | http://dspace.unl.edu.ec/jspui/handle/123456789/10326 |
| 标签: |
添加标签
没有标签, 成为第一个标记此记录!
|
添加标签 | 总结: | The research was conducted in the canton avocados, Zapotepamba neighborhood, in the area of production of guinea pigs Binational Technical Training Center-Zapotepamba (CBFT-Z) of the National University of Loja. This work aimed to evaluate the production parameters (feed intake, weight gain, feed conversion) and determine the return generated on completion of the work; to this an overview of expenditures (budget) and revenues of all treatments with different commercial feeds for feeding guinea pigs during growth and fattening phases it was developed. 36 male guinea pigs of 30 days old were used with a weight ranging between 217 and 258 grams, races Peru, Andina and Inti line; distributed in three treatments with two replicates each (six), with a mixed diet of balanced and maralfalfa fodder (Pennisetum violaceum), respecting the requirement for balanced by Castro (2002) and fodder as noted Aliaga (1979). In treatment 1 (T1): repeat 1 (R1) and repeat 2 (R2) the balanced Line Biomentos Cuy was used, brand Bioalimentar more maralfalfa; for treatment 2 (T2): R1 and R2 are used balanced Line Wayne Cuyes flag Champions S.A. Molinos greener pasture (maralfalfa) and treatment 3 (T3) or witness: R1 and R2 are arranged in the balanced developed more maralfalfa CBFT-Z. Consistent with the results, it was stipulated that the higher feed intake was recorded in treatment 1 (Balanced Bioalimentar) 17 097.66 g and less consumption occurred in treatment 2 (Balanced Wayne) 16 747.19 g; the best weight increase over the eight weeks of the process was in treatment 2 (B. Wayne) with 560.22 g showed the smallest increase in treatment 1 (B. Bioalimentar) with 549.69 g; the optimum feed conversion is expressed in treatment 3 (B. CBFT-Z) in the ratio of 3.99: 1, followed by treatment 2 and 1 with a ratio of 4.07: 1 and 4.09: 1 , respectively. Finally, profitability was negative, with a loss of $ 81.83. |
|---|