Estudio comparativo de seguridad y cobertura entre las tecnologías de IoT: LoRaWAN y SIGFOX.
In recent years, the number of devices connected to the Internet has exponentially increased, contributing to the fast growth of the Internet of Things (IoT). However, not all IoT devices establish their connection through conventional networks such as Wi-Fi and mobile networks. Low-Power Wide-Area...
Na minha lista:
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Formato: | masterThesis |
| Idioma: | spa |
| Publicado em: |
2023
|
| Assuntos: | |
| Acesso em linha: | https://dspace.unl.edu.ec/jspui/handle/123456789/27118 |
| Tags: |
Adicionar Tag
Sem tags, seja o primeiro a adicionar uma tag!
|
Adicionar Tag | Resumo: | In recent years, the number of devices connected to the Internet has exponentially increased, contributing to the fast growth of the Internet of Things (IoT). However, not all IoT devices establish their connection through conventional networks such as Wi-Fi and mobile networks. Low-Power Wide-Area Networks (LPWAN) are designed to link devices that require low data transfer rates, long battery life, and remote locations. This may include IoT devices that require a connection for sectors as diverse as agriculture, industry, logistics, manufacturing, transportation, energy, health, etc. This study presents a comparative analysis of coverage and security between LoRaWAN and Sigfox, two similar LPWAN IoT technologies with very different business models. A review of the technical characteristics that regulate these technologies is performed to understand and compare their strengths and weaknesses in the highly competitive world of IoT. To accomplish a valid comparison, coverage simulation software is used, and the obtained results are analyzed. Furthermore, the different security approaches in Sigfox and LoRaWAN are analyzed in the face of the security threats they may face. Keywords: IoT, LPWAN, Sigfox, LoRaWAN, security, coverage. |
|---|