Reforma a la Ley Orgánica de Comunicación para designar a su máxima autoridad mediante concurso de méritos y oposición y no a través de una terna enviada por el Presidente de la República
The Communications Law of Ecuador published in the Third Supplement to Official Gazette No. 22 dated June 25, 2013 in accordance with Art. 1 is to develop, protect and regulate, at the administrative level the exercise of communication rights constitutionally established. This law in the process of...
محفوظ في:
| المؤلف الرئيسي: | |
|---|---|
| التنسيق: | bachelorThesis |
| اللغة: | spa |
| منشور في: |
2015
|
| الموضوعات: | |
| الوصول للمادة أونلاين: | http://dspace.unl.edu.ec/jspui/handle/123456789/8583 |
| الوسوم: |
إضافة وسم
لا توجد وسوم, كن أول من يضع وسما على هذه التسجيلة!
|
إضافة وسم | الملخص: | The Communications Law of Ecuador published in the Third Supplement to Official Gazette No. 22 dated June 25, 2013 in accordance with Art. 1 is to develop, protect and regulate, at the administrative level the exercise of communication rights constitutionally established. This law in the process of discussion, debate and socializing between the different media and different sectors of the national and community prior to approval came under criticism, questions and observations of different nature, being the normative act in question proposed a system for monitoring all activities of public and private communication in Ecuador, being involved, the regulation of one of the civil rights and now according to our Constitution in force of the rights of freedom as indeed most momentous it is the freedom of expression and thought: Once entered into force the Law of communication we have been able to identify in the short time of application of the rule, the existing problems characterized by excesses in the faculties and intervention of the Superintendency of Information and Communication according to art. 55 is the technical watchdog, auditing, intervention and control, impose penalties, which has broad powers to enforce the rules of regulation of Information and Communication; Beyond the contradictions that I believe exist between this law and the Constitution evident obvious limitations to the fundamental right of people to express themselves, communicate and think freely, I will focus on the method of appointment of the highest authority of this body, the Superintendent of Information and Communication, the same as under the third paragraph of art. 55 of the law and then transcribe is chosen by the President of the Republic |
|---|