La vulneración del derecho constitucional a una vida digna en la fijación de alimentos congruos en la legislación ecuatoriana.
This study was carried out in the context of the violation of some constitutional rights in the fixing of consistent food, specifically the right to a dignified life, within the Ecuadorian territory. The objective of the investigation was to demonstrate that at the time of setting the congruous food...
Zapisane w:
1. autor: | |
---|---|
Kolejni autorzy: | |
Format: | masterThesis |
Język: | spa |
Wydane: |
2022
|
Hasła przedmiotowe: | |
Dostęp online: | http://repositorio.uotavalo.edu.ec/handle/52000/694 |
Etykiety: |
Dodaj etykietę
Nie ma etykietki, Dołącz pierwszą etykiete!
|
Streszczenie: | This study was carried out in the context of the violation of some constitutional rights in the fixing of consistent food, specifically the right to a dignified life, within the Ecuadorian territory. The objective of the investigation was to demonstrate that at the time of setting the congruous food under the application of Ecuadorian legislation, the right to a dignified life is violated by not determining a value that covers all the needs that allow people to live well, in where it safeguards its congruous support and achieves good living as indicated by the constitution of the Republic of Ecuador of 2008, even more so when it is a guarantor of rights. The methodology used had a qualitative approach, in addition to a non-experimental type of study. The techniques used were: observation and documentary review, and served to fulfill the specific objectives set. Through the legal analysis of the sentences, it was possible to determine the violation of the right to a dignified life of the people who request congruous food, due to the lack of a table that regulates congruous food since it is done according to the case. Among the conclusions of the study, it is determined that at the time of setting congruous food there is no application of the principle of equality in view of the fact that there is no specific table for the case, which implies the violation of several constitutional rights, taking into account that Ecuador is a guarantor of rights, however, the violation of the right to a dignified life was clearly demonstrated. |
---|